by ethanr » Wed Apr 20, 2011 7:48 am
Ya Reg I get what your saying, but I don't think you get what everybody else is saying. We aren't saying that because Flanno and Robinson have had a couple good games, we no longer need to buy any full backs. I think when Johnson is fit against and Kelly as well, we either have a really good RB and Johnson and a talented but getting better RB in Kelly, or use Kelly as a CB where he started. We still need a left back. It's fantastic that we had 3 injured full backs and had to turn to a 17 and 18 year old to hold down the fort, and they were able to do so against 2 of the top four clubs. The fact that we have youngsters with the ability and confidence to step up and fill the void means that when we do buy better players for those positions, we will be ok if one of them gets injured because we have those talented young players still developing into even more talented players. And when the players we have bought to fill these positions start to get too old our lose the pace and talent they had, we are ready with new players to fill the new void created by their lack of ability.
If they end up switching clubs because they can no longer progress under our academy and feel they won't start over those we buy, then so be it, we make more money on their transfers.
I'm thrilled Flanno and Robinson have played so well, but in no way do I believe they are the answer to our defensive problem. I fully expect to see Johnson or Kelly at RB next season and a new more experienced LB next season.
DESPITE THE FACT I LIVE IN CALIFORNIA...