Liverpool FC Forum

John Barnes' Granny wrote:

Redrider wrote:As a new member to this Website, I have relatively little knowledge of the site politics and do not get enough time to read sufficient posts to recognise multiple names of the same person. But what I have observed is a clique of personalities who seem to 'Hunt in a Pack' either supporting each others topic or disrupting a 'non-clique members topic'. Together with a very distasteful element of behaviour, where members of the clique pick up on a moderators comments to an individual member and join-in with a 'good kicking while he is down'
All very immature and reminiscent of Class 3b School Politics: we're in the gang and your not.
I also wonder about the position of the moderator, joining in with the 'hares' but really being a member of the hounds. Which seems to create an inflated position of respect and sycophantic behaviour from the clique members.

I'm not sure what you are driving at.

However, I do agree that there are certain members like A.B. and The Hustler/Hustler's Revenge, who get ganged up on. I think the A.B. thing is unfair, but its hard to have sympathy for the Hustler, who has been banned before for starting inflammatory threads.

John Barnes' Granny wrote:What about Richard Hillman?

,TJames?
,Cheescakery?

they are also cousins of his..... 

John Barnes' Granny wrote:Dom1, Beavis, Roberts, kindaconfuzed and Cheesecakery have too many usernames to list.

Dom1 wrote:

John Barnes' Granny wrote:Dom1, Beavis, Roberts, kindaconfuzed and Cheesecakery have too many usernames to list.

oh go on, let me see you try john!!

laza wrote:

Redrider wrote:As a new member to this Website, I have relatively little knowledge of the site politics and do not get enough time to read sufficient posts to recognise multiple names of the same person. But what I have observed is a clique of personalities who seem to 'Hunt in a Pack' either supporting each others topic or disrupting a 'non-clique members topic'. Together with a very distasteful element of behaviour, where members of the clique pick up on a moderators comments to an individual member and join-in with a 'good kicking while he is down'
All very immature and reminiscent of Class 3b School Politics: we're in the gang and your not.
I also wonder about the position of the moderator, joining in with the 'hares' but really being a member of the hounds. Which seems to create an inflated position of respect and sycophantic behaviour from the clique members.

All i can say to that is has anyone seen you and Kindaconfused in the forum list at the same time   

John Barnes' Granny wrote:

laza wrote:

Redrider wrote:As a new member to this Website, I have relatively little knowledge of the site politics and do not get enough time to read sufficient posts to recognise multiple names of the same person. But what I have observed is a clique of personalities who seem to 'Hunt in a Pack' either supporting each others topic or disrupting a 'non-clique members topic'. Together with a very distasteful element of behaviour, where members of the clique pick up on a moderators comments to an individual member and join-in with a 'good kicking while he is down'
All very immature and reminiscent of Class 3b School Politics: we're in the gang and your not.
I also wonder about the position of the moderator, joining in with the 'hares' but really being a member of the hounds. Which seems to create an inflated position of respect and sycophantic behaviour from the clique members.

All i can say to that is has anyone seen you and Kindaconfused in the forum list at the same time   

Yes, you can add Redrider to the list of kindaconfused's usernames.

John Barnes' Granny wrote:What about Richard Hillman?

,TJames?
,Cheescakery?

Roberts wrote:

John Barnes' Granny wrote:What about Richard Hillman?

,TJames?
,Cheescakery?

Yes I admit I am Richard Hillman, me and Dom are both .TJAMES and .Cheesecakery

And I'm Spartacus ,but I won't let him post in here .