Liverpool FC Forum

by **lakes10** » Fri Jun 25, 2010 10:33 am

Benny The Noon wrote:
lakes10 wrote:
Ciggy wrote:Somethings not right here and something is different.
When Houllier was sacked Moores & Parry had a list consisting of MON, Rafa, Mourhino, Strachan, Curbishley.
Thats two world class managers on that list and we got one of them, this list consists of Kenny, Hodgeson, Sven, Pellegrini and Rijkaard. The worst name on this list is Hodgeson yet he maybe our manager today.

like it or lump it Ciggy its down to the club talking too much time in letting Rafa go.
big named managers held off as long as they could in taking other jobs to see if the liverpool job was going to come up, other jobs come up before the liverpool one so they took them.

at the start of the year JM said he wished to comeback to England, he club he hinted at was Liverpool but we was never going to be able to give him the spending power he was looking for.

What utter rubbish - you have nothing at all to base that assumption on - Big name managers still wouldnt of touched us if rafa went months ago because we still would of been skint and we still wouldnt of been in the cl and we still would have the parasites for owners - which manager exactly did we miss out on then because the owners took too long ??

MON to start with.

by **Redman in wales** » Fri Jun 25, 2010 10:39 am

I agree - this transfer money saga has been done to death.

None of us know whether the future manager will get some or most or all of the money raised from player sales. It's all just speculation

Put the last two seasons together and we've spent more than we've received. That much we know is true. (putting two seasons togther negates the whole Johnson/crouch/keane sagas)

by **Benny The Noon** » Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:01 am

lakes10 wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote:
lakes10 wrote:
Ciggy wrote:Somethings not right here and something is different.
When Houllier was sacked Moores & Parry had a list consisting of MON, Rafa, Mourhino, Strachan, Curbishley.
Thats two world class managers on that list and we got one of them, this list consists of Kenny, Hodgeson, Sven, Pellegrini and Rijkaard. The worst name on this list is Hodgeson yet he maybe our manager today.

like it or lump it Ciggy its down to the club talking too much time in letting Rafa go.
big named managers held off as long as they could in taking other jobs to see if the liverpool job was going to come up, other jobs come up before the liverpool one so they took them.

at the start of the year JM said he wished to comeback to England, he club he hinted at was Liverpool but we was never going to be able to give him the spending power he was looking for.

What utter rubbish - you have nothing at all to base that assumption on - Big name managers still wouldnt of touched us if rafa went months ago because we still would of been skint and we still wouldnt of been in the cl and we still would have the parasites for owners - which manager exactly did we miss out on then because the owners took too long ??

MON to start with.

Says who ?

And surely i thought you were meaning better managers than rafa ? so who have we missed out on exactly

by **Benny The Noon** » Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:04 am

7_Kewell wrote:
Ciggy wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote:We need to pay back a lot of money to the banks so there is no way any new manager would get 50 mil to spend - dream land .

Yes the club has to pay 110,000 a day interest.
And people think Woy is getting 50 odd million to spend hahahahahaha

He'll get 12 million and will also keep any money from player sales. So if benny goes (7 mill) and masch go (25 - 30 mill) then he could have up to 49 million to spend.

Real also still owe us money for Alonso. They didn't pay 30 mill upfront. So rafa did spend everything he had last season

Where exactly is the 12 million coming from for starters seeing as we are in debt and we made a massive loss last year ? Do you really think money from the masher sale and benny sale would go straight to the manager when we owe so much money ?!

Also Woy may not have better players to use cause can you really see Gerrard and Torres and maybe even Pepe getting really excited by the appointment of Hodgson ?!

by **Judge** » Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:04 am

lakes10 wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote:
lakes10 wrote:
Ciggy wrote:Somethings not right here and something is different.
When Houllier was sacked Moores & Parry had a list consisting of MON, Rafa, Mourhino, Strachan, Curbishley.
Thats two world class managers on that list and we got one of them, this list consists of Kenny, Hodgeson, Sven, Pellegrini and Rijkaard. The worst name on this list is Hodgeson yet he maybe our manager today.

like it or lump it Ciggy its down to the club talking too much time in letting Rafa go.
big named managers held off as long as they could in taking other jobs to see if the liverpool job was going to come up, other jobs come up before the liverpool one so they took them.

at the start of the year JM said he wished to comeback to England, he club he hinted at was Liverpool but we was never going to be able to give him the spending power he was looking for.

What utter rubbish - you have nothing at all to base that assumption on - Big name managers still wouldnt of touched us if rafa went months ago because we still would of been skint and we still wouldnt of been in the cl and we still would have the parasites for owners - which manager exactly did we miss out on then because the owners took too long ??

MON to start with.

assumptions dont need to be based on anything, only facts

by **Benny The Noon** » Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:06 am

Redman in wales wrote:I agree - this transfer money saga has been done to death.

None of us know whether the future manager will get some or most or all of the money raised from player sales. It's all just speculation

Put the last two seasons together and we've spent more than we've received. That much we know is true. (putting two seasons togther negates the whole Johnson/crouch/keane sagas)

In your inital post you forgot to add the sale of Keane back to spurs - that may well balance your figures out just a little

by **jacdaniel** » Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:08 am

id bet my house that we wont be spending 50M. A big summer to Hicks is 5M plus some money from player sales. we might get Zamora or Donovan in.

by **Redman in wales** » Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:10 am

Benny The Noon wrote:
Redman in wales wrote:I agree - this transfer money saga has been done to death.

None of us know whether the future manager will get some or most or all of the money raised from player sales. It's all just speculation

Put the last two seasons together and we've spent more than we've received. That much we know is true. (putting two seasons togther negates the whole Johnson/crouch/keane sagas)

In your inital post you forgot to add the sale of Keane back to spurs - that may well balance your figures out just a little

didn't forget. I said SUMMER 2008. In the summer when the money was spent and received we didn't know that keane was going to be sold 5 months down the line.

by **Benny The Noon** » Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:12 am

Redman in wales wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote:
Redman in wales wrote:I agree - this transfer money saga has been done to death.

None of us know whether the future manager will get some or most or all of the money raised from player sales. It's all just speculation

Put the last two seasons together and we've spent more than we've received. That much we know is true. (putting two seasons togther negates the whole Johnson/crouch/keane sagas)

In your inital post you forgot to add the sale of Keane back to spurs - that may well balance your figures out just a little

didn't forget. I said SUMMER 2008. In the summer when the money was spent and received we didn't know that keane was going to be sold 5 months down the line.

In that case why wasnt he allowed to spend the money we got for keane ? does that transfer window get ignored or added on to the previous summer or the following summer when using it in arguments ? thats a big chunk of money - a good 16 million worth

by **7_Kewell** » Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:16 am

Benny The Noon wrote:
Redman in wales wrote:I agree - this transfer money saga has been done to death.

None of us know whether the future manager will get some or most or all of the money raised from player sales. It's all just speculation

Put the last two seasons together and we've spent more than we've received. That much we know is true. (putting two seasons togther negates the whole Johnson/crouch/keane sagas)

In your inital post you forgot to add the sale of Keane back to spurs - that may well balance your figures out just a little

We lost a fortune on Keane. Around 1 million for every month he was here.

by **Redman in wales** » Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:19 am

Benny The Noon wrote:
Redman in wales wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote:
Redman in wales wrote:I agree - this transfer money saga has been done to death.

None of us know whether the future manager will get some or most or all of the money raised from player sales. It's all just speculation

Put the last two seasons together and we've spent more than we've received. That much we know is true. (putting two seasons togther negates the whole Johnson/crouch/keane sagas)

In your inital post you forgot to add the sale of Keane back to spurs - that may well balance your figures out just a little

didn't forget. I said SUMMER 2008. In the summer when the money was spent and received we didn't know that keane was going to be sold 5 months down the line.

In that case why wasnt he allowed to spend the money we got for keane ? does that transfer window get ignored or added on to the previous summer or the following summer when using it in arguments ? thats a big chunk of money - a good 16 million worth

which is exactly why i said:

Put the last two seasons together and we've spent more than we've received. That much we know is true. (putting two seasons togther negates the whole Johnson/crouch/keane sagas)

he was allowed to spend it / had already spent it (depend on which way you look at at it.

by **Benny The Noon** » Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:23 am

I'm sorry but you seem to be the only person on any forum I have read that has said we have spent more than we have received because every figure I have seen shows us receiving more than spending

by **lakes10** » Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:26 am

look if we keep looking back and balling our eyes out over Rafa going then we are never going to move on, lets not forget that he had 15mil to spend last summer and it was left unspent. yes i know it was due to the clun not topping it up to the 22mil asking price for that player (his name i have forgot but i think he was russian).

lets try and keep this thread about looking for the new manager and what he could do or needs to do at the club.

for me the new manager needs to get shot of arounf 15 players at our club.....if that dont bring some money in then you got to ask yourself why did we buy them in the first place.

team spirit needs to be built up, hey Man poo have bigger debts than us and they still done better than we did last year.

by **Judge** » Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:29 am

fake alert

by **jacdaniel** » Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:33 am

So it looks like Roy could be appointed as manager at some point today. Either the board havent done any research at all or they're just choosing to ignore 90% of LFC fans.

This could well be one of the worst days in LFC history. And lol at the people thinking we're gonna be spending 50 - 70 million this summer.

Liverpool FC Forum

New Manager - Who would you have? (merged thread)

Who is online