Liverpool FC Forum

by **Benny The Noon** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:42 pm

lakes10 wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote:Torres was taken off becuase he was exhausted

balls, he did not think that himself and Stevie did not think that and thats why he put his hands on his head.

Did we improve after the change was made Lakes ?

Simple question which you can answer yes or no

by **red_guy** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:43 pm

Emerald Red wrote:
red_guy wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
red_guy wrote:It starts with Aqua had a virus ..twice, then the ankle injury, then no injury only 'mentally unstable' and now Torres injured his knee.. i don't know , well we all can see the expressions on Torres and Gerrard's faces during the substitution... and now, i don't know what to believe.

Then examine the evidence for yourself and go watch that Benfica game. Did you not see the hack from behind he received?

Yes , i did watch the Benfica game. If he's injured then we should start with Ngog then. Why bother using him on a bad pitch? I'm not questioning your loyalty to the manager, i'm just wondering what really happened in the dressing room.

It's got nothing to do with loyalty to the manager but more about knowledge of the game itself and not jumping to conculsions or assuming sh*t just because you are in a mindset that the manager is a clueless fat idiot who knows nothing about the sport when certain individuals can read all from a facial expression on the pitch and don't need to be talking to and watching the player train every day. Brilliant they are. They should take over tomorrow.

Well emerald, i'm not going to argue with you. I have an opinion and so do you. I respect yours and i expect you to do the same. As for me, i do believe something's not right in the team right now.
By the way, i never said anything about the manager being the clueless fat idiot.

by **lakes10** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:44 pm

Benny The Noon wrote:
Rockthekop wrote:Liverpool boss Rafa Benitez on the decision to take off Torres:

"He was exhausted, we played 60 minutes with 10 players the other day. Ngog was good for us because he was a pair of fresh legs. His movement was good for the team."

HE WASN'T INJURED!

Yet we improved when the chance was made

only due to one player putting good balls in, shame the person that could put the ball in the net had been taken off,
some will point to the fact that the chance only come once he had come off, this is tur put look where stevie started to play, more in the middle and pushing up and not sitting bacxk like he had done for 65mins.

by **lakes10** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:45 pm

Benny The Noon wrote:
lakes10 wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote:Torres was taken off becuase he was exhausted

balls, he did not think that himself and Stevie did not think that and thats why he put his hands on his head.

Did we improve after the change was made Lakes ?

Simple question which you can answer yes or no

as just posted

only due to one player putting good balls in, shame the person that could put the ball in the net had been taken off,
some will point to the fact that the chance only come once he had come off, this is tur put look where stevie started to play, more in the middle and pushing up and not sitting bacxk like he had done for 65mins.

by **account deleted by request** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:45 pm

lakes10 wrote:
tonyeh wrote:
NorfolkRed wrote:Sky sports news just said Torres had a knee injury

Bollocks

bloody hell someone better tell Torres and the rest of the players withhim as he did not know that.

nice one Lakes

by **Ciggy** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:46 pm

Benny The Noon wrote:Yet been told by people at the game they saw him walk down the tunnel with an ice pack ?

Well them people where wrong wernt they you have just heard it from the horses mouth !!!

by **lakes10** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:46 pm

1622: Remarkable, absolutely remarkable. David Ngog comes on for Liverpool - and he replaces Fernando Torres. There are loud boos at St Andrew's where Ngog is less than popular after his dive at Anfield earned Liverpool a draw against the Blues earlier this season. The boos could just as well be coming from the perplexed Liverpool fans. Torres also looks baffled

by **Blackcab** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:47 pm

Yes and No

by **lakes10** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:47 pm

Ciggy wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote:Yet been told by people at the game they saw him walk down the tunnel with an ice pack ?

Well them people where wrong wernt they you have just heard it from the horses mouth !!!

lol Get In !!!

by **tonyeh** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:48 pm

Benny The Noon wrote:Torres was taken off becuase he was exhausted

More bollocks

by **Benny The Noon** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:49 pm

So we didnt create more chances when torres went off

and torres hasnt missed chances over the last couple of weeks .

by **Blackcab** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:49 pm

Torres had some ice down his sock when he sat on the bench.

by **red_guy** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:51 pm

s@int wrote:
lakes10 wrote:
tonyeh wrote:
NorfolkRed wrote:Sky sports news just said Torres had a knee injury

Bollocks

bloody hell someone better tell Torres and the rest of the players withhim as he did not know that.

nice one Lakes

i guess that proves why the Argentinian players in Valencia used to call rafa 'God'.

by **The Good Yank** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:51 pm

Wow, alot of people whom I usually agree with are really banging on about the Torres sub. Torres had a tough day at the office, he came off (uninjured) and the team seemed to play as a team instead of hoofing balls up to our lone striker. Now, why couldn't that have been done with Torres in is another matter.

The sub that really has me scratching my head is Water Boy for Kuyt. Why not put him on for Lucas, and why not do it much earlier. Ankle injury? hmmm. Looked like he was just fine.

by **Ciggy** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:52 pm

Benny The Noon wrote:So we didnt create more chances when torres went off

and torres hasnt missed chances over the last couple of weeks .

He had no service thats why,we went for it the last 20 minutes because we had to Torres would have burried them chances maxi & Ngog missed tired or not :no

Liverpool FC Forum

BIRMINGHAM CITY VS LIVERPOOL - Sun 4 april - ko: 15.00

Who is online