Liverpool FC Forum

[The Specialist]

This whole bet thing was a bit overdramatic, yes.

Who cares what Lando or anyone thinks? Do they know you in real-life? No. Why bother getting wound-up about it?

Anyway, we can move on. Sorry if I was out of line, but really it's just that I don't see the point in people getting bothered by internet users and feeling the need to make big things out of stuff that should just roll off your back.

Back to Alonso..

[112-1077774096]

again i didnt raise the bet, but yes you are right, and thats why i ended it

[bigmick]

Feck me so much for my imput as to how I think Alonso has become less effective due to a) the opposition centre forward being able to mark him too easily, and b) him not moving into and recieving the ball in the right areas.

I even went into why I think Gerrard would play better with Masherano, and how the problems if they do indeed exist could be overcome. Alas, nobody gives a feck

All anyone really cares about is the difference between a theory and a hypothesis (don't ask me FFS) and whether or not two blokes are going to have a bet on something which can't be absolutely proven one way or another, in Nottingham, for thirty thousand pounds, tomorrow.

Come to think of it you guys are right, feck the football I'll shut me gob, your discussion is much more interesting    .

[Juve_Italia]

liverpool you!

england=animal



you all liverpool fans .. merda liverpool

animals

forza juve .. forza italia

[flombs]

Here the united forces of peewee and lando team up....

Ciao, Juve_Italia

Testa ti mincia or something like that

[112-1077774096]

liverpool you!

england=animal



you all liverpool fans .. merda liverpool

animals

good work, from the country where the killed a cop at the game, reguarly have running battles and dont forget the yearly scandal over match fixing.


whats your next trick

[bigmick]

If you refer to my earlier post, you'll notice that I'm a complete d!ckhead and I have no place on here. Hopefully I won't infest this space again.

[112-1077774096]

bye bye   

[flombs]

Animale, Cornuto, cornetto...mmmmmm cornetto

[flombs]

Ahhh, well that was refreshing

[Judge]

This thread has it all. Football, spats, porn (when Judge posts)

Versatile thread. 

Yeah that Judge, he doesn't post enough, i really can't get enough of his Avatar, oops i mean fantastic insight!!

This thread has more lives than a cat, it just refuses to die!

i am a genius

cheers lads 

[GunGod]

A "Hypothesis" (Which is basically another term for a theory)...

AHHAHAH WAHAHAHA ROFL! ROFL!

THEY ARE NOT EVEN THE SAME IF NOT ENTIRELY DIFFERENT IN MEANING.

Have you even checked your dictionary? This sentence of yours absolutely contradicts the purpose of having the two separate terms 'hypothesis' and 'theory'.

I couldn't even believe you said that.

So much for being a 'highly qualified English teacher'!!!!

I rest my case with you.

----------------------------------------------------

P.S.

Lando: "THEN try and f*cking condescend to me, you arrogant tw*t.  :"

With that statement of yours I guess I can be condescending to you anytime, mate. You just keep exposing your flaws everytime you reply to me

Bow down to me, ignoramus:

Suck my balls, c*nt
Check out the little bit that says "Definition".

Oh - the joys of proving a mouthy little tw*t wrong. 

Hhahahahahah!

Did I just see someone use a thesaurus for looking up on the meaning of words???

You are such an absolute joke mate. You just keep on and on and on making a fool of yourself each time you try to prove yourself.

Why don't you check out a proper online dictionaryinstead?

Check this out: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=82359&dict=CALD

It basically says a theory is a formal statement of rules which is used to explain an opinion.

Which basically means an opinion remains an opinion until it is proven and backed by concrete evidence. Then it can be said to be a theory --> law ---> fact.

And don't even try to worm your way out by saying 'theory' can be used in various ways, for what we are contesting ultimately, is the usage of the word 'fact' which you amusingly challenged others without even a good comprehension of what it means. If you want to talk about 'facts', talk about it in the scientific understanding. Don't bullsh!t that theory = hypothesis/opinion/guess.

In the academic world 'theory' is a serious word. But from your clueless usage of selected words I guess you are nothing but just a layman who makes educated guesses but ultimately doesn't know what he's talking about.

'Hypothesis' and 'theory', while not in absolute terms, share a relationship not unlike 'raw' and 'cooked'. While they might be the same piece of meat they are vastly different in composition.

Now Lando, let's just hear you say 'raw' and 'cooked' basically means the same thing.

WAHAHAHAH.

------------------------------------------------------

P.S. Given your crude nature in the forums it wouldn't be surprising you eat all your meat raw. That's why you can't differentiate well

AHHAHAA.

Shan't waste anymore time on you. Thks for all the laughter.

[Judge]

thankyou magnus 'gungod' magnusson

[mungi]

yea thanks for clearing that up

[Ciggy]

  See things havent changed in a week