s@int wrote:We could always have a "Would we miss Rafa now that Houlliers available again" thread.
oooo....yes please


Scottbot wrote:Cracking thread this an it's taken me a hour to catch up with the last 48 hours worth of posts. It does look like it's pretty much run it's course though.
A mixture of views on here which seem to fall into three different camps, FWIW I fall into the 3rd camp.
1 - We would be absolutely crazy to sell Alonso. One of our very best players and crucial to the future progression of the club.
2 - Sell him for the good of the team if the right offer comes in. He has performed below his own high standards the past 18 months and it's a great opportunity to build the team around Stevie.g in the middle of the park.
3 - Cracking player, we should keep him. Don't want to see him leave. Would only sell him if it was necessary in order to bring in the likes of E'to, Villa or Tevez to play up front.
s@int wrote:I am a number three as well Scott , maybe you could do poll ?(Preferably locked so it saves on the abuse)
s@int wrote:Scottbot wrote:Cracking thread this an it's taken me a hour to catch up with the last 48 hours worth of posts. It does look like it's pretty much run it's course though.
A mixture of views on here which seem to fall into three different camps, FWIW I fall into the 3rd camp.
1 - We would be absolutely crazy to sell Alonso. One of our very best players and crucial to the future progression of the club.
2 - Sell him for the good of the team if the right offer comes in. He has performed below his own high standards the past 18 months and it's a great opportunity to build the team around Stevie.g in the middle of the park.
3 - Cracking player, we should keep him. Don't want to see him leave. Would only sell him if it was necessary in order to bring in the likes of E'to, Villa or Tevez to play up front.
I am a number three as well Scott , maybe you could do poll ?(Preferably locked so it saves on the abuse)
redtrader74 wrote:Very interesting article in the Times, ranking players this season in relation to their importance and effect on thier own clubs.player rankings 2006-7
Our top ranked player was Reina,then Hypia, Kuyt,Alonso, lots of our players in the 100's+
GunGod wrote:Lando_Griffin wrote:OK - for the cretins once again:
In his first season when he broke his ankle, our team missed Alonso more than any other player, and the wins/losses proves this.
FACT.
Rafa Benitez sees him as instrumental to the side, and has said he, along with Gerrard, JC and Reina are the players he sees as the spine of the team.
FACT.
Our clean-sheets record is as much Xabi's doing as any other member of the defense.
FACT, and if you wish to dispute this - look up his tackling stats on Opta. I read them in the paper a few weeks back, and he's had a lot bigger impact than you realise. I can't be a*sed to trawl through the net just to shut a bunch of tw*ts up.
Xabi is the only member of our squad able to regularly dictate the tempo of a game, and allow the team to play to it's strengths.
FACT.
Xabi is the brain on the pitch, and it's his tactical and positional awareness that allows our fullbacks to go forward and help the attack, our centrebacks to challenge for offensive corners, our players to have an outlet when under pressure, and, despite his brilliance at spotting a long pass, he can also do the simple things to great effect.
These, my friend, are FACTS.
If you wish to dispute them, all I can suggest is that you actually watch him, rather than beating your meat over Gerrard for 90 minutes.
Erm, guys...I think we can end our argument with Lando already..because it's pretty obvious he doesn't understand the definition of 'facts'.
It's pretty embarassing for him indeed, going on about 'facts' only for us to realize he doesn't understand what he himself is talking about. So lets all stop laughing at him after I give him a simple lesson in differentiating between terms.
Fact 1: Humans need oxygen to live.
Fact 2: Liverpool beat Chelsea in the Champions league semi-finals 2007.
Opinion 1 (more accurately, Hypothesis 1): "In his first season when he broke his ankle, our team missed Alonso more than any other player, and the wins/losses proves this.."
Opinion 2: "Our clean-sheets record is as much Xabi's doing as any other member of the defense."
Opinion 3: "Xabi is the brain on the pitch."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Now why is Opinion 1, an opinion?
The win/losses as cited by our young Lando which 'proves' his point does not prove anything at all. For there all more then 1 independent varible which can cause a change in the dependent variable. Simply put, in those games that we lost w/o Alonso, we might have also lost other players; the coach's formation selection played into the opposition's hands; the weather suited the opposition more etc etc the list goes on.
Until you have calculated every single variable (which is hardly possible) only to discover the hard truth that Alonso's absence is the cause for defeats, then only can you cite it as a 'fact'.
Now why are Opinions 2 and 3, just Opinions?
Try to apply the logic as explained above. This will be your homework for the week young Lando.![]()
------------------------------------------------------------
P.S. Honestly I can't believe you said "Xabi is the brain on the pitch" and proclaimed condescendingly "THESE, my friend, are facts."
ROFL.
Excuse the unbridled laughter.
redtrader74 wrote:oops, maybe we could start as a thread on its own? MODS
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 56 guests