Reg wrote:Strange that both Meeeeelan clubs are rebuilding their squads this summer and neither are interested in Mancini. ??
I read he's got a year left on his contract but is looking to buy it out. Perhaps he's signaled he wants to leave Italy ? .
Reg wrote:Strange that both Meeeeelan clubs are rebuilding their squads this summer and neither are interested in Mancini. ??
Judge wrote:Owzat wrote:Judge wrote:my immediate shopping list, that i feel are getable:
Micah Richards
Aaron Lennon
Santa Cruz or
Thierry Henry
Richards yes, Lemon no.
Santa Cruz yes, Henry no.
I'm sure we had this debate a week or so ago, concluding Lemon was no better than our very own lemon (Pennant) I know it was concluded Bentley is much better, can't remember who the fourth name thrown in the hat was.
And Santa Cruz is one player the top clubs should be wanting, top marks to Hughes for that steal (GBJH, £3.5m for Santa Cruz is the true definition of a steal, NOT £15m for Crouch) My main concern is Hughes isn't going to like Liverpool of all clubs trying to steal Bentley and Santa Cruz from him. We might prise one out of his hands, but I doubt we'd get both without a foo king great carrot - and I don't mean Riise!
If I were playing a footy management game right now, with our current squad and £25m to spend then I'd be shortlisting Richards, Bentley, Santa Cruz and Berbatov - the latter simply because I'd try and somehow generate the funds to land him. I'd then be contemplating a LB and LM, maybe get Warnock back (another rover) To fund that little lot I'd be looking to offload Riise, Pennant, Crouch and assessing our younger players as cover for any others who could be spare including Voronin, Crouch and maybe even Hyypia. If I had to sacrifice a player I'd like to keep in order to afford a player I'd badly want then so be it, no room for sentimen in football
But even if we only managed two from Richards, Bentley, Santa Cruz and Berbatov I'd be happy we'd improved the squad, even if it cost 3-5 squad players to raise the extra doh
lennon keeps the ball better than our pennant, imo.
and i feel is more technically gifted, with more pace and a better attitude
dawson99 wrote:shouldnt look at who costs what, just look at who will play best for liverpool.
no point saying 4 million is a good price if the guy is useless and we get rid in a season. got to be careful on who we buy this summer. ie - buy a player and actually keep him for a bit
RedRoots wrote:dawson99 wrote:shouldnt look at who costs what, just look at who will play best for liverpool.
no point saying 4 million is a good price if the guy is useless and we get rid in a season. got to be careful on who we buy this summer. ie - buy a player and actually keep him for a bit
I'd hardly call Mancini useless.
Seano Kop wrote:RAUL!!!!!!!!
Sabre wrote:Seano Kop wrote:RAUL!!!!!!!!
Sabre shivers.
¡No!
Raul won't triumph in Liverpool, and you can quote me on that.![]()
He's a good goal poacher, has that instinct to be in the proper place IF you play him upfront. Outside the box this days he's not dangerous, and his work ratio makes him incompatible to play with Torres. He works next to zero.
I like Raul. I really do, but he'd be a luxury if we cannot play him as first eleven option week in week out. And to play 2 strikers, and provided we play Torres, Raul is a too weak option, work wise.
Owzat wrote:There's no point buying the wrong player at the 'right price' but if the right player costs too much then you have to look elsewhere. Of the few games I've seen Mancini play this season I've not been impressed, some will say you can't go wrong at £4m, but surely it's better to buy a proven player at £12m than 3 gambles at £4m each? Playing footy management games you can buy lots of theoretical bargains, get carried away and you end up with a big squad of modest quality.
The players we should be looking at should not be cheap. We've got enough players bought at mid-price, we need more Torres' and Mascherano's. Is it any great coincidence the champions of the past four years have a plethora of £15m+ players?
£15m+
Chelsea (8) : Shevchenko, Essien, Drogba, Cashley?, Makelele, Wright-Phillips, Carvalho, Anelka
Man Utd (5) : Rooney, Ferdinand, Hargreaves, Carrick, Anderson
Liverpool (2) : Torres, Mascherano
Not a great many cr ap players in there, maybe Shove-penny and Cashley were over-priced, but basically only Arsenal have ever mastered the budget style Premiership title. Unfortunately for the goners their manager then dismantled the invincibles until they were more invisible than invincible.
Owzat wrote:There's no point buying the wrong player at the 'right price' but if the right player costs too much then you have to look elsewhere. Of the few games I've seen Mancini play this season I've not been impressed, some will say you can't go wrong at £4m, but surely it's better to buy a proven player at £12m than 3 gambles at £4m each? Playing footy management games you can buy lots of theoretical bargains, get carried away and you end up with a big squad of modest quality.
The players we should be looking at should not be cheap. We've got enough players bought at mid-price, we need more Torres' and Mascherano's. Is it any great coincidence the champions of the past four years have a plethora of £15m+ players?
£15m+
Chelsea (8) : Shevchenko, Essien, Drogba, Cashley?, Makelele, Wright-Phillips, Carvalho, Anelka
Man Utd (5) : Rooney, Ferdinand, Hargreaves, Carrick, Anderson
Liverpool (2) : Torres, Mascherano
Not a great many cr ap players in there, maybe Shove-penny and Cashley were over-priced, but basically only Arsenal have ever mastered the budget style Premiership title. Unfortunately for the goners their manager then dismantled the invincibles until they were more invisible than invincible.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 50 guests