s@int wrote:LFC2007 wrote:s@int wrote:LFC2007 wrote:s@int wrote:Lando_Griffin wrote:s@int wrote:There was no Manc domination back then.
No because WE WERE DOMINENT then mate
And had been for over a decade when Dalglish took over.
Surely you can see this?
Same thing could be said when Souness took over. Didn't stop him from making a pigs ear of it did it.
Souness was and is a shit manager.
Exactly, but we still managed to win a cup. Just goes to show to win the English League you have to be good, to win a cup any cr@p manager can do that
That wasn't the point, the point was; the situation Souness inherited was one in which we'd dominated for the previous decade. When Rafa took over, the dynamics of the league were entirely different, and more difficult, and we hadn't been dominating for years. Not to mention that he's had no prior experience of English football.
Souness took over, we went from 1st and 2nd in the two previous seasons to 6th, 6th, 8th.
Rafa's a significantly better manager than Souness.
There are many factors that make the circumstances which Rafa inherited at the club far more difficult than what Souness or even Evans inherited 10-15 years ago. They've been explained before so I shouldn't need to go into them again.
And my point was it doesn't matter how dominant the team had been, a cr@p manager can still make a mess of it. Dalglish was a good manager and has the record to prove it.
Rafa has still to prove that in the premiership, just as Dalglish never proved it in Europe.
Evans wasn't a bad manager and we certainly played more attractive football under him than we have under Rafa.(admittedly less successful)But then again he took over in much more difficult circumstances.
Rafa took over a side that had finished 4th the previous season and had won a glorious treble only a few seasons before, and it was mainly that team that won the CL.
Evans took over a team that was 6th off the bottom.
Come on mate, one look at the pts totals over the last three seasons and it's clear that the bar's been raised (twice over 90pts, once 89?). That'll bear out the Chelsea factor, they dominated the league in a large way down to the fact that Mourinho had silly money to play with, that wasn't the case under Evans' tenure - that is a huge factor to account for. Blackburn spent big, but nowhere near the scale with which Chelsea spent (and continue to) - hence (partly) why Blackburn couldn't sustain their league position. Chelsea raised the bar, the Manc's consistently spent big, and have manager who knows the league inside out, Wenger had been here for years, he also knew the league inside out. The league is quite a bit stronger now than it was when Souness and Evans were managers, partly because of our ban from European competition. The treble was nice, but the UCL win was just a whole new level that we hadn't reached for over two decades.
Dalgish was a very good manager, but equally Rafa's not a sh!t manager, he's done a good job without being outstanding, and the circumstances he inherited were quite tough, not to mention the circumstances he's had to deal with during his tenure (Owen f*cking off, Gerrard mingling with Chelsea twice, a relative lack of funds compared to our rivals, new owners undermining his position). Evans had experience of English football, Rafa had none, I don't think the squad he inherited in 2004 was that good, it was average, and depleted.
Circumstances upon arrival and during a manager's tenure do matter, significantly.
In the event that you reply, I refer you to my previous answers - I can't be arsed to reply
