by bigmick » Sat Dec 22, 2007 10:30 pm
It seems like a good time to bring up the old rotation thing again, what with the teams impressive win over Pompey on Saturday. What has rotation got to do with this win,
what possible relevance could the "R" word have as of now. Well....
Pompey was the third game out of the last four which have been huge games for us. The Carling Cup game, with all due respect to the fans who travelled down to Chelsea, was always going to be less important than Marseilles/Man Utd and Pompey, and in my opinion the manager correctly played a second string team down there to protect his first choice eleven. Now without researching it, I think I'm right in saying that in the three important games, Rafa has played exactly the same in all three. If there have been any "restings", "possibilities", "options" then they have been absolutely to a minimum. My point? One or two people claimed they could sense a slight changing of tack by the manager visa vis rotation a few weeks back and were lambasted by many. It now appears that in actual fact they were onto something. I'm not saying we are in a "seeing of the light period", but we are certainly in a period where we playing what we consider to be, or very close to be our best eleven in all the games that matter, it's an excellent developement.
My second point is this. Unfortunately, during the period of unchanged line-ups, we produced a performance which was somewhat lacking in verve, a bit flat and in the most important match of all, against Man Utd. Why was this? Well quite possibly (as the pro-rotationers) will tell you, because the self same team had travelled to marseilles in the Champions League for a crucial, must win tie and the legs were a bit heavy come the weekend. They maybe onto something.
Also of course, prior to the Marseilles game we played a very strange line up against Reading, and conceded defeat once we needed snookers with twenty minutes left. Why? wll obviously because we needed a result in Marseilles, which was fair enough in my book.
Here's my theory though. Had we not rotated to quite such a ridiculous extent in those heady days at the start of the season, my hunch is that we wouldn't have been beaten at Home to Marseilles ansd Away to Besiktas in the middle of our "blip". I think we might have at the very least picked up a couple of points from those two games. Then, we wouldn't have needed a fully fit, fired up and raring to go performance in france, and we could have like the "stuck in the nineties" Wenger, and Like Ferguson played a severely weakened team in our last Champions League grioup game.
Now if anybody has managed to follow this far without falling asleep, my feeling is we could have fielded this team, the one that trounced Pompey and Marseilles, against reading and I have no doubt we would have absolutely mullered them. We could have rested the team in Marseilles as we had already qualified, and we could have been much fresher against Man Utd.
Messing around earlier in the season with the team and having to play catch up has cost us, all in search of the delayed gazelle theory.
"se e in una bottigla ed e bianco, e latte".