by bigmick » Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:43 am
Well in absolute fairness, everyone takes the p!ss out of the manager always saying we controlled the game but we actually did control that one. The problem though was the same as it pretty much has been all season, we didn't get a second goal. You could also argue that we never really looked like getting one either, and although they didn't create much it was hardly the biggest surprise in the World when they equalised.
A couple of posters have talked recently about the manager "getting the hang of the Premiership", and to some extent he has. We didn't mass rotate from game one this season for instance, which had obvious beneficial consequences. He tried to sign proven premiership players in the Summer, recognising that certain players don't seem to take to it, despite having ability. This reluctance to see though, this failure to accept that football in England is cut and thrust, end to end in which the most ambitious team often prevails is a mystery to me.
Because of the way the rules are interpreted in England, you will come under sustained pressure as an Away team in the last five minutes or so if you're only one goal to the good. Because you can challenge for and press the ball, because teams are happy to lump it in, and because the Home fans demand that they "have a go", they will. It really doesn't matter how much you've controlled it up until that point, teams are going to get free kicks, corners etc and they are going to attack you in numbers. As such, to be only one goal to the good is a risk, which you ought to try and take steps to avoid in the period where you are "controlling the game". Further, if you take all your offensive players off (or in this case both of them to be more accurate) teams will see it as an open invitation and attack you in ever increasing numbers.
Now on here we have our resident stat man, Owzat. Mystifyingly to me, some find him and his stats a right royal pain in the erse but leaving that aside, he does provide some fascinating insights. From reading his posts I am now totally convinced that you ought to be aiming to win 27 games, and that draws are more of a hinderance than a help. He posts on here for free, so it seems to me Rafa has two choices. He can either read the stats on here while he's having his Moccacino after training, or he can employ someone at the club to tell him he needs to win 27 or so football matches. Either way, having been given the information he would then realise that holding back, settling for a point, trying to close games out and trisking drawing them etc is madness. If we can afford 20.3 million quid to spend on a striker we don't like, surely we can afford to pay somebody to have a look at how many games teams which win the league generally win during the course of a season.
I remember Rafa saying at the start of last season that he once won the title with Valencia having drawn a stack of games, and apparently he did. What worries me a bit though, is that this was his fourth season in the Premiership and he still hadn't really got that it wouldn't work over here. This is his fifth, and seemingly he still hasn't. He may well be getting the hang of the Premiership, but how long till we can say he's got it. Two more years so he's had as much time as Ferguson perhaps?
"se e in una bottigla ed e bianco, e latte".