JBG wrote:A.B. wrote:Diouf dived and thats why he got kicked on the ground, however I don't recomend those kind of tackles.
The FA has decided NOT to punish Sissoko for the incident, according to BBC.
I'm going to play Devil's Advocare here and say the FA were wrong not to investigate Sissoko's stamp on Diouff.
Gerrard's was an accident and Kevin Nolan wanted no further investigation.
However, Sissoko's stamp was very much intentional. It just shows how weak the game's governing bodies can be. While Sissoko's stamp was nasty is probably wasn't potentially career threatening like Essien's tackle on Hamman. However, had the tackle been on Ruud Van Nistlerooy or a Chelsea player instead of a universally disliked Bolton player there would have been uproar in the papers and the FA would have taken action.
For selfish reasons I'm glad they aren't (for Liverpool's sake) but it does show the hypocricy in football.
The FA could not take actions against either Gerrard or Sissoko. The referee had included the incidents in his report and under FA rules they can only review an incident that the referee has not seen.
I disagree somewhat with you comment that Sissoko should shoul ddirect his nastiness the way Roy Keane did. Did you not forget Roy Keanes career ending tackle on Alfe Inge Haaland, that was done by his own admission as revenge. Sissoko was stupid to risk the tackle but it was hardly a career threatening tackle, he was just giving Diouf some payback for persistently cheationg throughout the game. I'm sure Carragher would of been the one is Sissoko hadn't.
I think Sissoko is creating a his own persona and hopefully he will become the new Vieira with regards steel and aggresion, then we will be fit to tackle any situation.