Should we have kept baros? - Hind-sight

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby Mark 23 » Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:31 pm

I'll my opinion, Baros isn't good enough, and he is proving that at Villa, he is rumoured to have had a fallout with O'Leary as well, his attitute stinks and he was holding out for a move anyway from what I heard, he had no loyalty to us.  I'm made up he has gone.
User avatar
Mark 23
 
Posts: 279
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 10:00 pm
Location: Liverpool

Postby GunGod » Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:51 pm

Scottbot wrote:Jesus, everyone jumped all over this.  It seems hapen a lot on here these days and is one of the reasons this forum is going to rats. I admit that Baros has been 'done to death' when he was at the club and he's probably been done a couple of times since. I probably should have just kept my thoughts to myself.

I just got thinking how unusual it is to have such a successful season (in terms of league progress, FA Cup run) and to do so with a group of strikers who have been (on the whole) awful for nearly the entire season. It's been a good season, i just wondered if it might have been a better season had we offloaded Cisse/Moro and stuck with Baros is all. Sometimes fans regret selling a player, even players they wanted to go at the time. I was curious to see how many (if any) were regretful that Milan left in the summer.

Come to think of it, we shouldn't have kept Baros for the 6m offered.

Instead, we should have given Sinama a spot in the 4 first team striker slots. That is of course, on hindsight that any striker would be better than Moro at the moment (as Lando mentioned).

Also, I feel that Baros and Sinama are rather similar players so we should have kept either one at the club.
GunGod
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 7:20 pm

Previous

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 127 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e