Kharhaz wrote:Penguins wrote:"Well, Rafa wouldn't spend it well anyway so they shouldn't give him any money"
That is bull**** as that isn't the real issue, which is that the owners isn't investing in the squad. You really think a new manager would get more money just cause he isn't Rafa?
It is bull. You are right. The amount Rafa has played with doesnt justify us being skint. I'll say now as I said at the start of the season. 17M on a fullback??
The money was there, and thats what it was spent on. Aquilani, injured yes, but the agreements for future fees are there.
Or are you really asking, why cant we have the ludicrous amounts Real Madrid have or Man City.
Blame the owners by all means, I totally disagree however. He has had the money. He has had the players. He has shown he cannot be trusted with either. Will a new manager get more money? no, probably not. But I can hazard a guess he will get the maximum out of whoever we sign for whatever fee.
But please do forget that Alonso and Arbeloa left....
And without them leaving there would had been 0 to spend.
He wasn't even allowed to spend the money from sales straight up either. More like 7 for Johnson and 5 for Aqualini.
I'll tell you where those other 25 million went!
I'll never give in to this point.
There is a HUGE difference to "sell to be able to buy" and just buy and don't worry about sales.
I am not expecting City like summers where the manager can spend 100 million without selling. But I do expect the manager to have around 20-30 million each summer without have to have a garage sale 1st!
Johnson is england international ffs and both Chelski and Man City matched our bid.
What do you expect. Shopping at bargain basement and still expect league title? Real world calling
