Festy wrote:GYBS wrote:in our formation that brings out the best in torres and gerrard mate we dont need to blow our budget on another striker and have to change our formation to fit that striker into the team - we did that last summer when i said we shouldnt of done and we wasted 20 million. lets not make the same mistake again - we need a bit more creativity behind torres and alongside gerrard - silva fits that role perfectly - he can play wide left or right or behind the striker - can play as a striker , has loads of pace and skill and can feed in little balls to torres to unlock defences - tevez while a great player would just be another worker who would chip in with goals . we need creativity now .
Nah, Gerrard needs to earn his place and Tevez would give him tough competition. I can even see Gerrard being dropped to bench as a back-up for Tevez.![]()
![]()
But seriously, Tevez would be a far better choice than Kuyt on the right side in any of the 4-2-3-1/4-3-3/4-5-1 formations.
why would tevez be a better choice ? what has tevez proved playing out right ? Kuyt has produced the goods for us . we need someone with a bit of pace and creatitivy - we need an arshavin and thats where silva comes in .