Sir Roger wrote:I have said before that "focussed and single minded" could easily be replaced by "arrogant and stubborn".
Owzat wrote:bunglemark2 wrote:I don't think N'gog had an easy challenge last night, playing the lone striker with no service at all, or when it did come to him, it was at chest height.
I wondered what on earth was going on and how much fault you can find when a third (at best) choice striker is thrown in at the deep end, but I guess it was G&H's fault Rafa signed him and G&H's fault Rafa played that formation and G&H's fault Rafa played N'Gog and G&H's fault N'gog was not taken off despite struggling.
I just hope for those praying we get a new set of owners that the finances change, and Rafa actually spends better than he currently does. Because who knows what excuses will come out if G&H go, Rafa stays, is given £100m a summer to spend and we still don't win the league.
LFC2007 wrote:Sir Roger wrote:I have said before that "focussed and single minded" could easily be replaced by "arrogant and stubborn".
Whatever his shortcomings may be as a manager I've never fully understood where the charge that he's an 'arrogant' man came from. I think he's quite the opposite.
Perhaps people confuse the stubbornness you can see in his footballing doctrine with his personality. Myself, I would explain that stubborness as a measure of the faith and patience he has in his methods - an extension of his professionalism if you like, and that you may well construe as a limitation - but I certainly wouldn't characterise it as a mark of an 'arrogant' man. I can't be the only to have noticed the deep disappointment in his eyes during the harder times in his career - a man so engrossed with himself wouldn't be prone to such expressions of emotion.
bigmick wrote:I'm talking here about from the end of last season until now only.
Now if we take the second place and four points behind/record points total/playing some of the best football we've played for years etc etc as not a flash in the pan or a fluke, we must also give the manager credit for taking us there over five years. There's no question that that team, playing in that way, was a long way removed from the team which he had when he took over. In that sense, it is easy to make the argument that there had been "progression", and for the purposes of this thread, lets just assume it as a given.
So how did we get from there to here? Is it just one of those things, just an unexplainable bliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiip that will right itself given time? Is it simply that we've been a bit unlucky, what with balloongate, a couple of injuries to key players, Aquilani not actually being "ready in a month" etc? Is it perhaps that Rafa wasn't given enough money to spend in the Summer? We know he spent 38 million quid or thereabouts but pulled in 33, is it not his fault and the reason that we aren't doing better is simply because he wasn't given more cash? Did he think he was getting more and then had the plug pulled (the "plughole theory"), is it "fecking Purslow" and actually his fault?
Did we over invest on Johnson even though he's top notch, and would we have been better off getting a different right back, Gareth Barry instead of Aquilani perhaps? Is our decline the result of a gradual disillusionment with rafa's "coldness", his lack of "the arm around the shoulder" approach gradually wearing thin with players? Are we paying the price for too many of the squad being not up to it, too many "option and possibility" buys?
Lots of questions there. I'll open it up with the "Lucasgate" theory. I think it was a very poor piece of judgement to take a view that Lucas/Masherano could hold the fort until the more creative midfielder was available. I'm not necessarily blaming Lucas (although he isn't good enough to be fair to the lad) I'm blaming Rafa for thinking he could hack it initially, then even worse solving the problem by moving Gerrard back and then continually revisiting it to prove it doesn't work.
Quite simply, given our personel we shouldn't have bought Aquilani unless we were prepared to play Gerrard in central midfield. It was excusable just about for a game or two, but not to stick with it.
Big Niall wrote:We only have 2 top class outfield players in SG and Torres and SG came through the LFC system, so of the current squad Torres is the only exceptional player Rafa has bought.
The amount of money wasted is astonishing.
Emerald Red wrote:Big Niall wrote:We only have 2 top class outfield players in SG and Torres and SG came through the LFC system, so of the current squad Torres is the only exceptional player Rafa has bought.
The amount of money wasted is astonishing.
That's one of the biggest load of bollox posts I've ever read on here.
Bad Bob wrote:andy_g wrote:he's a victim of circumstance. however, he has had a hand in creating those circumstances.
as many point out, our first choice starting eleven is mouthwatering; reina, johnson, carra, agger, aurelio, mascherano, aquilani, kuyt, reira, gerrard, torres. that team could - and probably should - beat anybody out there. the problem so far this season is that we haven't been able to play that team, or anything near it. benitez did the right thing in buying quality with aquilani and i think his calculated bet was about right that lucas and mascherano and gerrard would be able to hold the fort until the italian was ready. however, he wasn't to know that lucas just wouldn't step up, that mascherano would be day dreaming of barcelona instead of playing his game, that kuyt wouldn't be at the level he was at the end of last season, that agger would take longer to get back to fitness, and that reira, torres and gerrard would spend time early on out injured.
but then again, why over the last 5 years has he not built a squad capable of covering tough times? outside of that utterly delicious first 11 we have - apart from benayoun and possibly insua - dross backed up by dross with a bit of dross waiting in the wings. and drossena. in my opinion he has made a series of serious misjudgements with the purchase of squad players and a serious misjudgement espcecially with the lack of cover for torres. there is quite a few million quids worth of dross there as back up players so the 'he hasn't had money to spend' argument doesn't wash with me.
i know he has had trouble with the owners etc etc etc. but with the money he HAS been able to spend over the last 5 years we should have a much stronger squad and at least 2 decent strikers.
he also could have handled the alonso situation a lot better. its hard to tell if the summer he tried to flog him was a ploy to get his level back up again, or whether he really did want shut. if he wanted shut then he seriously misjudged alonso quality, despite him having had an average couple of seasons. if it was a ploy to get him to raise his game then it worked, but at too higher price - alienation of the player.
a victim of circumstances which are to a large degree of his own making.
Top post, Andy, and sums up my feelings nicely. Rafa's had to deal with a lot of issues since G & H took over but he's also had to deal with a lot of problems of his own making. In the past he's managed to pull the fat out of the fire in time but this particular bliiiiip has all the hallmarks of serious decline. At some point you have to wonder how in the bl.oody hell we let so many players go that have been replaced by patently inferior knock-offs. It's truly a sad state of affairs when you look wistfully at the likes of Bellamy, Riise and Cisse and wonder what if? Sabre's said in another thread--and I concur--that this is the time to raise serious concerns about Rafa because 4 successive losses for a club of our stature is simply not acceptable, no matter what the circumstances. I also take Southcoast Shankley's point (again from another thread) that things are starting to feel a lot like they did during the waning end of Houllier's tenure. Dark days indeed.
andy_g wrote:he's a victim of circumstance. however, he has had a hand in creating those circumstances.
as many point out, our first choice starting eleven is mouthwatering; reina, johnson, carra, agger, aurelio, mascherano, aquilani, kuyt, reira, gerrard, torres. that team could - and probably should - beat anybody out there. the problem so far this season is that we haven't been able to play that team, or anything near it. benitez did the right thing in buying quality with aquilani and i think his calculated bet was about right that lucas and mascherano and gerrard would be able to hold the fort until the italian was ready. however, he wasn't to know that lucas just wouldn't step up, that mascherano would be day dreaming of barcelona instead of playing his game, that kuyt wouldn't be at the level he was at the end of last season, that agger would take longer to get back to fitness, and that reira, torres and gerrard would spend time early on out injured.
but then again, why over the last 5 years has he not built a squad capable of covering tough times? outside of that utterly delicious first 11 we have - apart from benayoun and possibly insua - dross backed up by dross with a bit of dross waiting in the wings. and drossena. in my opinion he has made a series of serious misjudgements with the purchase of squad players and a serious misjudgement espcecially with the lack of cover for torres. there is quite a few million quids worth of dross there as back up players so the 'he hasn't had money to spend' argument doesn't wash with me.
i know he has had trouble with the owners etc etc etc. but with the money he HAS been able to spend over the last 5 years we should have a much stronger squad and at least 2 decent strikers.
he also could have handled the alonso situation a lot better. its hard to tell if the summer he tried to flog him was a ploy to get his level back up again, or whether he really did want shut. if he wanted shut then he seriously misjudged alonso quality, despite him having had an average couple of seasons. if it was a ploy to get him to raise his game then it worked, but at too higher price - alienation of the player.
a victim of circumstances which are to a large degree of his own making.
brentd4 wrote: RAFA'S CONSPRIACY
is it possible that rafa is doin this on purpose. no one cud possibly want to hav the squad of players rafa has got. he's sold some of r best players, in alonso arbeloa, crouch. brought in players of league1 quality with voronin, ngog, lucas, spent silly money on players to just sell for half that in a few months.
cud he be doin this out of spite because the board tried to bring klinsmann in behind his back. rafa is runnin the club down financially, also in terms of quality and also because he signed a contract recently so will get a big payout if sacked.
Dazzer wrote:Rush Job wrote:Dazzer wrote:NANNY RED wrote:I would just like to see what Rafa could do without any off the field disturbances ,To buy without having to sell, Thats all. if that happens an he fails , then ill think about it lol
TBPH I think there are other managers under more stress in league that are doing better job IE... paul hart @ pompey.But in ideal world it would be great but I feel rafa will go before the owners do even tho I atm would like to see owners gone before rafa still by a margin.
Hart is under pressure alright mate but Im not sure how you can say he`s doing a better job?
I ment with resources he has had to rafa ? you think I am wrong ? prove it.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Feedfetcher and 94 guests