LFC2007 wrote:bigmick wrote:Lots of questions there. I'll open it up with the "Lucasgate" theory. I think it was a very poor piece of judgement to take a view that Lucas/Masherano could hold the fort until the more creative midfielder was available. I'm not necessarily blaming Lucas (although he isn't good enough to be fair to the lad) I'm blaming Rafa for thinking he could hack it initially, then even worse solving the problem by moving Gerrard back and then continually revisiting it to prove it doesn't work.
Quite simply, given our personel we shouldn't have bought Aquilani unless we were prepared to play Gerrard in central midfield. It was excusable just about for a game or two, but not to stick with it.
I'm a little surprised by this. I seem to recall a time in pre-season when you advocated Lucas playing alongside Masch in midfield at the start of the season. Indeed, IIRC, you even argued for his inclusion alongside Masch after the Spurs and Stoke games and before the Villa game.
Commence the criticism from a later date by all means.
Well I've made many posts on the subject mate and no doubt if you chop one of them up you'll find a spot where I advocated giving Lucas a go in a game. It may well have been against Chelsea as playing two sitters there would be OK.
Before the season started though I was very firmly in favour of playing Gerrard in central midfield "once we've worked out that Lucas isn't up to it" is the phrase I think I used, so no with all due respect I think this time I can't be accused of swerving it.
The essential problem as I've said a few times is that when Lucas and Masherano play together, the distribution of the football from central midfield isn't done with the necessary quality.