Racism - And lfc

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby SouthCoastShankly » Mon Jan 09, 2012 9:51 am

ethanr wrote:
Reg wrote:Just a passing thought on the meaning of life and nothing specific about this form or its members....

Exaggerated protection is a backlash reaction to earlier persecution. IE, its ok to be gay and exercise some very strange rights including same sex marriage and adopting children but you can't call them what they are - gay.

As a result of slavery (abolished in 1833) we're not allowed to even mention the colour of a person's skin - as Maxipaxi can attest.

The problem is not the colour of the guy's skin, nor the fact he might be gay, but that the handup's associated with the images created in the past overwhelm peoples' sensitivities.  Example 'whenever I think of Cyril Regis I visual Kunta Kinte'.  Nothing wrong with that, 'Roots' was a great book and a great film, very well acted and got a lot of deserved praise. But 90% of people will have thought oh..oh.. its a racist thing when they read my comment. Its not at all but we've conditioned ourselves to fear every reference to black people in fear of upsetting them.

Or laughing at gay skits from the 1960's and 70's etc.. Alf Garnett, 'It aint half hot mum' etc... or the Black and White Minstrels etc.. it was humour, not bad intent. Sure we've moved on, but no racist offense was meant.

Half our problem today exists in our minds and not in reality. The lad was crying.... WHAT? he came to Anfield and cried (remember Nani?) I put it to you he couldn't handle teh occasion, match nerves and nothing to do with racism.

I agree.  I've been referred to as white, and I take no offense to that.  I've referred to people as black, or hispanic, or asian and I've done so because I felt it was relevant.  If I was saying something about a black person and saying that they're black wasn't relevant, I didn't mention it.  I do the same when I talk about white people, or Asian people, or hispanic people, or anybody.

I think for many it's a comfort level thing.  I'm comfortable with the fact I'm not racist, and I'd never say something with racist intent to somebody, but others hear something and love to make a big deal out of it because they want to sound superior or something like that.  I've seen more often white people take offense and say that something was inappropriate then a person of the particular race in the same conversation, and it seems they often do so because they want that person of the relevant race to think they aren't racist or something.

A few months ago I went to a preseason American football match.  After the game we went down to the parking lot and hung out with some people from the opposing team (it was preseason and nobody really cares).  There was this huge black guy named Doug there who introduced himself to us.  Somehow the city of Oakland was brought up (Largely a black population) and Doug said he'd stay far away from Oakland right now because there was some dangerous stuff going on.  The lady with us said something a long the lines of "You're a big black guy and even you're scared of Oakland right now."  It wasn't meant to be racist or insulting, and Doug seemed to take no offense to it at all.  But after she said it, Doug said "Hey, I'm not black, I'm Doug." He didn't say it in an angry way or anything, he just said it.  I thought it was really cool the way he said it because he doesn't care about his skin color, people are people and that's how he sees them.  I looked around and there were white people, black people, hispanic people, asian people, just people from all different races who supported the 2 teams that just played each other, and we were all having a good time.  Nobody cared what color anybody else was because it didn't matter.  It's all about being comfortable with it, and when all 50 or 60 people that hung out with us were comfortable with it, race basically went away.

A big problem with racism as well is people are always trying to be careful what they say, so they can't always say exactly what they're trying to say.  Alan Hansen said the word colored, and had to apologize for it.  He didn't mean it in a negative way at all, but some people take offense to it, so it became an issue.

Come on, seriously.

Can you not see the difference between

"big black guy" - describing someone's looks, where race is quite an important part of that description.

"fucking black cunt" - insulting someone where their race has no importance whatsoever.

The UN's legal definition of racial discrimination is -

"racial discrimination" shall mean any distinction, exclusion, restriction, or preference based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin that has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life.

So we can all be "cunts" but the moment you make a distinction with race (i.e. black cunt), the assumption is only the black race are cunts.

I really am staggered that the basic concept of discrimination is so hard to grasp! ???
Last edited by SouthCoastShankly on Mon Jan 09, 2012 9:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
SouthCoastShankly
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 6076
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 4:36 pm
Location: West Sussex

Postby dawson99 » Mon Jan 09, 2012 9:59 am

andy_g wrote:i think people need to take a wider view on the subject, as there are much more subtle and deeper connotations to race reference than many are making out. a lot of the pejorative content of racial abuse is connected with the history of the race being abused. white people have rarely been shát on by another race - hence being called a 'white bast'ard' doesn't really cut too deep, while 'black bast'ard does. a white person called out a black person references the domination of blacks by whites for long periods in history. same with the irish in many respects - and englishman calling someone an 'irish bast'ard' works in a similar way and relates the subjugation of the irish by the english.

racial slurs in this context are exactly that, they make keen reference to the perceived inferiority and undesirability of the one being abused.

its obviously a much more complex issue than this, but its a key point that is often overlooked, especially by those that think its just a casual reference to skin colour and origin.

I don't buy that. White Chicks is fine, but if David Spade made a movie called Black Chicks it wouldnt be. You can't only have racism one way, that's not how it works.

and this long periods in history malarkey, thats exactly what it is... history.
0118 999 881 999 119 7253
Image
User avatar
dawson99
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 25377
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 12:56 pm
Location: in the mo fo hood y'all

Postby andy_g » Mon Jan 09, 2012 10:01 am

dawson99 wrote:and this long periods in history malarkey, thats exactly what it is... history.

yeah... but we don't like it when people say that about us  :;):

as we know all too well, history can't just be forgotten
Image

Get up! everybody's gonna move their feet
Get Down! everybody's gonna leave their seat
User avatar
andy_g
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 9598
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 10:39 am

Postby dawson99 » Mon Jan 09, 2012 10:08 am

andy_g wrote:
dawson99 wrote:and this long periods in history malarkey, thats exactly what it is... history.

yeah... but we don't like it when people say that about us  :;):

as we know all too well, history can't just be forgotten

yeah but that doesn't mean that now white jokes are fine but black jokes aren't.

You have MOBO awards (music of black origin) is there a MOWO awards?

Is there a movie called Black men can't swim?

Racism is discirmination against all colours, not just a few of them.
0118 999 881 999 119 7253
Image
User avatar
dawson99
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 25377
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 12:56 pm
Location: in the mo fo hood y'all

Postby andy_g » Mon Jan 09, 2012 10:12 am

dawson99 wrote:Is there a movie called Black men can't swim?

aha... but they can't!!

eric the eel
Image

Get up! everybody's gonna move their feet
Get Down! everybody's gonna leave their seat
User avatar
andy_g
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 9598
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 10:39 am

Postby Kharhaz » Mon Jan 09, 2012 10:19 am

andy_g wrote:
dawson99 wrote:Is there a movie called Black men can't swim?

aha... but they can't!!

eric the eel

:laugh: at least he finished, id have just sank !

Although calling him an eel could also be construed as racist by the many sensitive types that are emerging.
Bill Shankly: “I was the best manager in Britain because I was never devious or cheated anyone. I’d break my wife’s legs if I played against her, but I’d never cheat her.”
User avatar
Kharhaz
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 6380
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 1:18 am

Postby lakes10 » Mon Jan 09, 2012 10:44 am

SouthCoastShankly wrote:Come on, seriously.

Can you not see the difference between

"big black guy" - describing someone's looks, where race is quite an important part of that description.

"fucking black cunt" - insulting someone where their race has no importance whatsoever.

The UN's legal definition of racial discrimination is -

"racial discrimination" shall mean any distinction, exclusion, restriction, or preference based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin that has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life.

So we can all be "cunts" but the moment you make a distinction with race (i.e. black cunt), the assumption is only the black race are cunts.

I really am staggered that the basic concept of discrimination is so hard to grasp! ???

:bowdown  :buttrock
Image
User avatar
lakes10
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 12993
Joined: Sat May 22, 2004 8:31 pm
Location: Essex, England

Postby supersub » Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:08 am

SouthCoastShankly wrote:So we can all be "cunts" but the moment you make a distinction with race (i.e. black cunt), the assumption is only the black race are cunts.

It depends if you see black as a race or as an adjective
to describe the person you see before you when using the insult....baldy,fat,skinny,ugly,spotty,geeky,ginger,white,
four eyed etc..
THERE'S A GREAT BIG BEAUTIFUL TOMORROW SHINING AT THE END OF EVERY DAY.
THERE'S A GREAT BIG BEAUTIFUL TOMORROW AND TOMORROW IS JUST A DREAM AWAY.
User avatar
supersub
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 7276
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2003 11:38 pm
Location: knackers yard

Postby Johnny Boy » Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:48 am

As an aside it really worries me what our owners are thinking, the Downing issue just puts an image in mind of John Henry sinking his head into his Cornflakes, or pancakes if that's what he has!
User avatar
Johnny Boy
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 1021
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 6:18 am
Location: Lancashire

Postby dawson99 » Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:58 am

Johnny Boy wrote:As an aside it really worries me what our owners are thinking, the Downing issue just puts an image in mind of John Henry sinking his head into his Cornflakes, or pancakes if that's what he has!

So all Americans eat pancakes?

Image
0118 999 881 999 119 7253
Image
User avatar
dawson99
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 25377
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 12:56 pm
Location: in the mo fo hood y'all

Postby maguskwt » Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:33 pm

dawson99 wrote:
Johnny Boy wrote:As an aside it really worries me what our owners are thinking, the Downing issue just puts an image in mind of John Henry sinking his head into his Cornflakes, or pancakes if that's what he has!

So all Americans eat pancakes?

Image

pancakes are good...
Image
maguskwt
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 8232
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:39 pm

Postby laza » Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:26 pm

andy_g wrote:i think people need to take a wider view on the subject, as there are much more subtle and deeper connotations to race reference than many are making out. a lot of the pejorative content of racial abuse is connected with the history of the race being abused. white people have rarely been shát on by another race - hence being called a 'white bast'ard' doesn't really cut too deep, while 'black bast'ard does. a white person called out a black person references the domination of blacks by whites for long periods in history.

So because of history a white person regardless whether his country of origin was or wasnt  involved in domination of blacks cant use term black bast'ard.
However does this mean a person of Asian background whose country wasnt involved in domination can get use that term not be judged as racist  ???
Forever Red in this life and the next
User avatar
laza
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 8408
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 11:17 am
Location: The Sharkbait captial of the world

Postby SouthCoastShankly » Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:29 pm

supersub wrote:
SouthCoastShankly wrote:So we can all be "cunts" but the moment you make a distinction with race (i.e. black cunt), the assumption is only the black race are cunts.

It depends if you see black as a race or as an adjective
to describe the person you see before you when using the insult....baldy,fat,skinny,ugly,spotty,geeky,ginger,white,
four eyed etc..

I agree and that is why I prefer to use the term discrimination as opposed to racism. Racism has far heavier implications.

Regardless of the adjective if you include a feature of a person prior to an insult you discriminate them based on the adjective. You add a racial feature and you have racially discriminated him/her.

I'm as sick and tired of over politically correct judgements as anyone but where I do draw the line is to discriminate a person based on an aspect of their person they have no control over (race, ethnicity, etc). It's easy to say "i wouldn't be offended if i was called a white ... whatever" when you have lived in a society where you aren't discriminated against.
Last edited by SouthCoastShankly on Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
SouthCoastShankly
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 6076
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 4:36 pm
Location: West Sussex

Postby andy_g » Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:32 pm

laza wrote:
andy_g wrote:i think people need to take a wider view on the subject, as there are much more subtle and deeper connotations to race reference than many are making out. a lot of the pejorative content of racial abuse is connected with the history of the race being abused. white people have rarely been shát on by another race - hence being called a 'white bast'ard' doesn't really cut too deep, while 'black bast'ard does. a white person called out a black person references the domination of blacks by whites for long periods in history.

So because of history a white person regardless whether his country of origin was or wasnt  involved in domination of blacks cant use term black bast'ard.
However does this mean a person of Asian background whose country wasnt involved in domination can get use that term not be judged as racist  ???

as i said, its obviously a lot more complicated than i described - but in many ways that sense of condescension and discrimination is at the heart of it.
Image

Get up! everybody's gonna move their feet
Get Down! everybody's gonna leave their seat
User avatar
andy_g
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 9598
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 10:39 am

Postby dawson99 » Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:52 pm

So on tv, when everyone always say italians are chickens, and french people have bad hygeine.. whats that?
0118 999 881 999 119 7253
Image
User avatar
dawson99
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 25377
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 12:56 pm
Location: in the mo fo hood y'all

PreviousNext

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 130 guests

  • Advertisement
cron
ShopTill-e