by stmichael » Thu Nov 01, 2007 3:30 pm
I think Houllier made initial advances in modernising the club, say on an infrastructural level. However, as a coach on the footballing side of things and as a man, he doesn't compare to Benitez.
Houllier kept making the same mistakes over and over again and the way in which he treated certain players was terrible, especially players who showed any intent of bringing some individuality to our game. In the transfer market he squandered a hell of a lot of money, a lot more than some great ones he actually made. He never did anything about these mistakes either. Benitez has already shipped off players that he has bought who he deems to have failed.
In his interviews he was patronising and frustrating, never addressing any criticism levelled at him yet always being smug about himself. Benitez, even when we win is the first to look at all the negatives and is far more constructive. Houllier would bring out inconclusive statistics etc to make himself look good.
I think with Benitez there are greater times coming and I think while Houllier may have put his experience as a director to decent use, this wasn't the case on the training ground or on the pitch, not in the long term. We had a great year in 2001, but his tenure was longer than that one year and that can't forgive what was mostly very frustrating for me. Houllier's players have talked about the impact Benitez made to the footballing side of things.