by stmichael » Mon Jun 14, 2004 3:12 pm
I was watching a video of the 1997/98 season recently and I found myself asking this question. It has been said on numerous occasions, and by Michael himself, that his all round game has improved since he came onto the scene and this is undoubtedly true. Anyone who has spent 6 years playing at the highest level and not improved technically needs to look at himself. What I will attempt to discuss however is his effectiveness as a player.
The Michael Owen of today is now much better at receiving the ball with his back to goal. As he has grown stronger he is now better equipped to withstand the attentions of a defender and his touch is also better.
With his increased strength and stature, his aerial ability has improved manifold. Although still relatively small, he is more than able to hold his own and now scores regularly with his head. This area of his game has shown the most marked improvement.
There is then his previously much-maligned left foot. He has clearly worked on what was an obvious weakness. Left footed Michael Owen goals were a very rare commodity prior to the Treble season but since then he has shown a greater willingness to shoot with his left foot, reflecting a greater confidence in it. Whilst it is clear that he still instinctively uses his right foot whenever possible, he is now more than capable of scoring with his “swinger”. Cup Final, anyone?
He is also scoring a greater number as well a greater variety of goals. I’m not sure of the exact figures but I think that barring his injury-interrupted season of 98/99 he has scored more goals than in his debut season.
So there you go. He is now a better player. Isn’t he?
The Michael Owen of 1998 had the surprise factor. He was also young and fearless and eager to do well. These factors were instrumental in making him the most exciting prospect in the world in 1998.
It has become clear in recent times that the hamstring problems that have dogged Michael for 5 years have taken the edge of his blistering pace. The 98 version was a bundle of energy and was a nightmare to defend against. The ’04 version is still reasonably quick but many defenders are now able to keep pace with him. In ’98 that didn’t happen. No defender had an earthly of beating him for flat out speed.
With this pace came the confidence that he could beat anyone put in front of him. The ’98 version was equally happy dropping deep or playing off the last defender. Although more slight than he is now, he used his body extremely well. Using his pace to get in front of a defender he would then lean in and with his low centre of gravity was almost impossible to stop. He KNEW he could beat his man. The ’04 version either no longer has this belief or doesn’t have the ability.
I don’t know if it is my memory playing tricks but I don’t remember the ’98 version missing many chances. He scored 18 Premiership goals (joint Golden Boot winner) but often didn’t play as the main striker. It is very difficult to assess whether he was a better finisher because there are so many factors that determine it. The most mysterious of them all being confidence.
Along with his goalscoring though, the ’98 version was also the leading assist man that season. He was more willing to take up wide positions and provide chances as well as making his own. The ’04 version is much more reliant on his team mates for service. Whether this is because of the tactics employed by Evans vs Houllier is a whole other topic but it must be considered. I believe though that the Michael Owen of 1998 was a much easier player to play with.
Is it unreasonable to expect a player that is such a sensation at a young age to continue in the same vein and all the time add to the attributes that he already has? You would think not but I tried to think of players that have achieved this and could only come up with Pele and Maradona. That is a bit difficult to live up to. In Wayne Rooney we can see the kind of fearlessness that Michael Owen showed 6 years ago. Will Rooney be a shadow of his former self and follow the likes of Gascoigne and Fowler into the category of “Unfulfilled Potential”? My point is that maybe it is unfair to expect Michael to be twice the player he was.
I feel that whilst the ’04 version is a more technically complete player, the ’98 version is a far more potent and versatile attacking weapon.
In answer to my original question, I suppose the only way to answer it is with this hypothetical question.
“If you had a time machine and could bring an 18yr old Michael Owen back to the present day and replace the 24 yr old, would you?
On balance, it might be worth a shot. He would make a better partner for Cisse.
What do you think?