Bad Bob wrote:s@int wrote:Bad Bob wrote:JoeTerp wrote:every time THEY were building from the back, Keane was was left, especially in the beginning.
It looks like Tony Barrett agrees with you, Joe.
"There is still no genuine width and the idea of having Robbie Keane stationed on the left wing is one which will take some getting used to, but, in the absence of players who get chalk on their boots, Liverpool are still managing to use the central areas of the pitch to good effect."
ECHO match report
Not so sure about that Bob, he then goes on to say - "Yossi Benayoun is certainly enjoying working with an overlapping full back as his second half strike illustrated as he moved inside from his station wide left and produced a jinking run and finish which brought the Ullevaal Stadium to its feet.
For me Keane ran the channels on a few occasions but was more often running through the middle. (I thought he was making too many similar runs to Torres and they at times were almost stepping on each others toes)
Ahh, so he does, mate.Is this shuffling about something that we can chalk up to pre-season experimenting, I wonder, or is the plan to have the likes of Keane, Benayoun, Kuyt, Gerrard, Babel, etc. interchanging in the attacking third?
I certainly thought there was a lot of interchanging going on , Torres ran the channels for a while when Kuyt moved inside, but I think its early days to be deciding on a formation. A lot will depend on if we get Barry or not, and the return of Masch. I think we will probably stick with 4-4-2 until then.
The big problem for me is where Gerrard will fit in once Masch is back. I am not keen on him taking Kuyts role, and if as looks likely Keane and Torres are going to be an attacking pair, I can't see him playing behind the front two.
Maybe centre mid with Masch, but that then means Barry on the left, and no room for Alonso?