god_bless_john_houlding wrote:Same as Riise then Fowler_E7? Good shot but not a decent defender. Lets bring Alan Kennedy back, he can score the winning goals in another two European Cup finals as well. Come on Barney.
Fowler_E7 wrote:Rafa-Dodd wrote:He's English for a start, and I fully believe we need to bring in a few more England players who know exactly what our football in all about. Its no concidence to me that Chelsea and United are full of English stars, because thats why they do so well in the season.
Dont agree with your point here, we have almost as many british players in our team as chelsea or Man utd do, we have Crouch, Pennant, Gerrard, Finnan, Carragher, and Carson in the first team squad, plus Harry Kewell (7)who though he is Australian has been playing in England since he was a kid and has never played foriegn football.
Man Utd have Carrick, Hargreaves, Rooney, Brown, Ferdinand, Scholes, Giggs, Neville, O'shea, Smith, Flethcher and foster in there first team squad. (12)
Chelsea have Terry, Lampard, A. Cole, J.Cole, Wright-Phillips, Bridge, Johnson, and Sidwell (8)in there first team squad.
We still have a good core of British players, which is only slightly less than Man Utd or Chelsea have, i mean were no were near as bad as Arsenal.
I have no problem with us buying English talent, but i dont think we should be buying players because there english, like its and en extra skill or something, its the quality thats the most important thing.
Rafa-Dodd wrote:Fowler_E7 wrote:Rafa-Dodd wrote:He's English for a start, and I fully believe we need to bring in a few more England players who know exactly what our football in all about. Its no concidence to me that Chelsea and United are full of English stars, because thats why they do so well in the season.
Dont agree with your point here, we have almost as many british players in our team as chelsea or Man utd do, we have Crouch, Pennant, Gerrard, Finnan, Carragher, and Carson in the first team squad, plus Harry Kewell (7)who though he is Australian has been playing in England since he was a kid and has never played foriegn football.
Man Utd have Carrick, Hargreaves, Rooney, Brown, Ferdinand, Scholes, Giggs, Neville, O'shea, Smith, Flethcher and foster in there first team squad. (12)
Chelsea have Terry, Lampard, A. Cole, J.Cole, Wright-Phillips, Bridge, Johnson, and Sidwell (8)in there first team squad.
We still have a good core of British players, which is only slightly less than Man Utd or Chelsea have, i mean were no were near as bad as Arsenal.
I have no problem with us buying English talent, but i dont think we should be buying players because there english, like its and en extra skill or something, its the quality thats the most important thing.
When you see our team on matchdays though mate its never got the british influence that United or Chelsea have on matchdays.
Also I would love us to go for some of the English stars of the future like Richards and Baines. I would honestly liked to have seen us put a bid in for Bent or Nugent.
I know people will argue we should buy the best whatever the nationality, but I would like to see Liverpool adopt a buy at home policy. They grew up watching and playing our football and are more likely to succeed than a 19 year old Spanish player.
My thoughts anyways.
LFC2007 wrote:I'd take Riise over Heinze any day, his defensive awareness at times may not be as strong but he's younger and much more versatile.
Rafa-Dodd wrote:When you see our team on matchdays though mate its never got the british influence that United or Chelsea have on matchdays.
Fowler_E7 wrote:Rafa-Dodd wrote:When you see our team on matchdays though mate its never got the british influence that United or Chelsea have on matchdays.
Maybe not as much as Man Utd, but easily as much as Chelsea and more than Arsenal. We usually have at least 4 British players in the starting 11, Chelsea usually have the same, Arsenal have no English first team regulars.
god_bless_john_houlding wrote:Why if we are looking to overhaul United this season, would we want to buy one of their players who can't even cement a place in the United 1st team? Surely if he's not good enough for them, then he's not good enough for Liverpool
Leonmc0708 wrote:Fowler_E7 wrote:Rafa-Dodd wrote:When you see our team on matchdays though mate its never got the british influence that United or Chelsea have on matchdays.
Maybe not as much as Man Utd, but easily as much as Chelsea and more than Arsenal. We usually have at least 4 British players in the starting 11, Chelsea usually have the same, Arsenal have no English first team regulars.
Its not the British or English influence that matters with us.
couldnt give aas long as we have at least a couple of scousers in there.
They are the heartbeat of this club, not some cockney ponce or geordie muppet.
Fowler_E7 wrote:Leonmc0708 wrote:Fowler_E7 wrote:Rafa-Dodd wrote:When you see our team on matchdays though mate its never got the british influence that United or Chelsea have on matchdays.
Maybe not as much as Man Utd, but easily as much as Chelsea and more than Arsenal. We usually have at least 4 British players in the starting 11, Chelsea usually have the same, Arsenal have no English first team regulars.
Its not the British or English influence that matters with us.
couldnt give aas long as we have at least a couple of scousers in there.
They are the heartbeat of this club, not some cockney ponce or geordie muppet.
Agree completly, thats why Gerrard and Carragher are so important, they no what the club all about and represent its values on the pitch. Just buying a bunch of Englishmen dosnt make your team have more passion or pride. Players who are brought up at the club know what the club is all about, the history and what the club means to the fans, this shows on the pitch.
god_bless_john_houlding wrote:Fowler_E7 wrote:Leonmc0708 wrote:Fowler_E7 wrote:Rafa-Dodd wrote:When you see our team on matchdays though mate its never got the british influence that United or Chelsea have on matchdays.
Maybe not as much as Man Utd, but easily as much as Chelsea and more than Arsenal. We usually have at least 4 British players in the starting 11, Chelsea usually have the same, Arsenal have no English first team regulars.
Its not the British or English influence that matters with us.
couldnt give aas long as we have at least a couple of scousers in there.
They are the heartbeat of this club, not some cockney ponce or geordie muppet.
Agree completly, thats why Gerrard and Carragher are so important, they no what the club all about and represent its values on the pitch. Just buying a bunch of Englishmen dosnt make your team have more passion or pride. Players who are brought up at the club know what the club is all about, the history and what the club means to the fans, this shows on the pitch.
Sorry to go back to the good old days of yester year but our 1977 European Cup winning side wasn't full of scousers, nor was our 1986 double winning side. I more than most am 1 for putting scousers in because they know what Liverpool is all about, they grew up with the stories, but to say the only British lads should be mainly scouse is wrong. Many people's Liverpool's greatest sides would include 2 possibly 3 scousers in, the rest would be most probably British or Irish. Can't see many players from abroad getting in there. So a good couple of British lads would do just as well as a few our local lads.
Rafa-Dodd wrote:E_fowler, you have actually changed my mind tonight.
Give yourself a gold star.![]()
But I would still like to see us chase a few English youngsters like Bale and Richards.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 35 guests