New stadium - A couple of questions

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby RedBlood » Tue Dec 05, 2006 4:15 am

Why dont we call it 'Strawberry Feilds'  loool
Seriously a beleive like alot of you 'New Anfeild' would be best with The Kop remaining or main stand.
This way we can move forward but remeber our roots, and there worth remebering.
It would also show us fans that these Dubai boyz understand and respect what this club has acheived and what it stands for.
User avatar
RedBlood
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 1473
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 3:31 am

Postby The Manhattan Project » Tue Dec 05, 2006 5:12 am

Will the Arabs continue with Carlsberg as a sponsor?

china syndrome 80512640 reactor meltdown fusion element
no uniquely indefinable one 5918 identification unknown 113
source transmission 421 general panic hysteria 02 outbreak
foreign mutation 001505 maximum code destruction nuclear
reflection 01044 power plutonium helix atomic energy wave
User avatar
The Manhattan Project
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 5416
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 7:22 am
Location: Reactor Number Four

Postby Lando_Griffin » Tue Dec 05, 2006 5:42 am

The Manhattan Project wrote:Will the Arabs continue with Carlsberg as a sponsor?


That is a very good question mate.

I can't see them being too annoyed by that when they've just bought Travel Lodge, who have lager-filled veding machines in their  receptions! :D

Seriously, though - would it hurt us to change, seeing as we get a very poor deal from them as it is?
Image
Image

Rafa Benitez - An unfinished Legend.
User avatar
Lando_Griffin
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 10633
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 3:19 pm

Postby Ciggy » Tue Dec 05, 2006 7:01 am

The Manhattan Project wrote:Will the Arabs continue with Carlsberg as a sponsor?


Doubt it and I hope not, cant wait to get that Carlsberg logo off our kit its old and dated now.
I reckon it could be Pepsi, if anyone has ART sport all the adverts have all the superstars advertising pepsi.
There is no-one anywhere in the world at any stage who is any bigger or any better than this football club.

Kenny Dalglish 1/2/2011

REST IN PEACE PHIL, YOU WILL NEVER BE FORGOTTEN.
User avatar
Ciggy
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 26826
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 2:36 pm

Postby Woollyback » Tue Dec 05, 2006 9:07 am

the ground should be called new anfield, although i'm sure it will have a corporate sponsor name as there's megabucks in it. i just hope it ends up like boro where it was the bt cellnet riverside or southampton's friends provident st mary's stadium so eventually the corporate name just fades away. something like the pepsi new anfield stadium would be fine by me if they want to pay us a fortune for the privilege

for the stands:

the kop
the shankly stand
the paisley stand
the hillsborough memorial stand

i just really hope there will be a distinct "end" which can be clearly differentiated from the rest of the ground and will become the kop. i would've thought the club will aim for this as the kop is one of the most marketable things about LFC at the end of the day, it would be daft to not have it in the plans
b*ll*c*ks and s*i*e
User avatar
Woollyback
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 12400
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 3:11 pm
Location: Manchester

Postby puroresu » Tue Dec 05, 2006 9:46 am

The Manhattan Project wrote:Will the Arabs continue with Carlsberg as a sponsor?


I would be glad if Liverpool made tops avaliable without the Sponsor.  Rangers sell tops for there Muslim fans without Carling on them and and would be great if Liverpool did that.
User avatar
puroresu
 
Posts: 3070
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:30 am

Postby Reg » Tue Dec 05, 2006 10:12 am

Just call it Anfield. Why change?

More likely, bearing in mind the improved status of the club and Chelsea like prospects (please...) the asking price for shirt sponsership will shoot up, Carlsberg will get the boot and we'll have a mobile phone name on our chests pretty pdq.

Stadium name depends purely on who has deep enough pockets. 'Thats just the way it is' . Would be nice if the stadium could sneak back upto 70,000 tho eh?  :eyebrow
User avatar
Reg
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13530
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 12:24 am
Location: Singapore

Postby stmichael » Tue Dec 05, 2006 2:43 pm

Can see the arguments for making it just 60,000 but to deny yourself any opportunity to expand later on seems a bit narrow minded.

However Anfield can be as souless as any stadium and there has been more than a few complaints over the past few years at the atmosphere which makes me wonder why people are so scared of moving to another 'souless stadium'.

It's not the bricks and steel that make a stadium it's the people in it so if the attitude is wrong it doesn't matter where you are.

The last thing we should be doing is looking to scrap the plans for the stadium and start again, it's been hard enough getting through the red tape and fighting off consistant ground share plans without going through it all again.

Just because we might have the money to build an 80,000 seater stadium doesn't necessarily mean it's definitely the best thing for the club.

Incidentally, am I right in thinking the designs do have one single-tiered end ie the new Kop or have I made that up??
Last edited by stmichael on Tue Dec 05, 2006 2:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
stmichael
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 22644
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 3:06 pm
Location: Middlesbrough

Postby Leonmc0708 » Tue Dec 05, 2006 2:47 pm

puroresu wrote:
The Manhattan Project wrote:Will the Arabs continue with Carlsberg as a sponsor?


I would be glad if Liverpool made tops avaliable without the Sponsor.  Rangers sell tops for there Muslim fans without Carling on them and and would be great if Liverpool did that.

Why ?

Thats football.

If you dont like it then dont follow it.

Does my head in all this.

You cant even have a St Georges flag i nyer garden incase you :censored: a paki off !!
JUSTICE FOR THE 96

Image
User avatar
Leonmc0708
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 8420
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 11:44 am
Location: SEFTON SHED

Postby stmichael » Tue Dec 05, 2006 3:07 pm

The Manhattan Project wrote:Will the Arabs continue with Carlsberg as a sponsor?


No chance.

Infact I've heard reports that plans are already underway to replace Carlsberg with LG.
User avatar
stmichael
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 22644
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 3:06 pm
Location: Middlesbrough

Postby red37 » Tue Dec 05, 2006 3:59 pm

stmichael wrote:It's not the bricks and steel that make a stadium it's the people in it so if the attitude is wrong it doesn't matter where you are.

Wait till they hit ebay...then see how much they're worth  :D
Image



TITANS of HOPE
User avatar
red37
LFC Guru Member
 
Posts: 7884
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 7:00 pm

Postby puroresu » Tue Dec 05, 2006 5:52 pm

Leonmc0708 wrote:
puroresu wrote:
The Manhattan Project wrote:Will the Arabs continue with Carlsberg as a sponsor?


I would be glad if Liverpool made tops avaliable without the Sponsor.  Rangers sell tops for there Muslim fans without Carling on them and and would be great if Liverpool did that.

Why ?

Thats football.

If you dont like it then dont follow it.

Does my head in all this.

You cant even have a St Georges flag i nyer garden incase you :censored: a paki off !!

What  is your problem.  I wasnt saying Liverpool must get rid of Carlsberg.  Like you said If I dont like it, dont buy it which I choose to not to do.

I just brought up the idea of LFC selling shirts with and without the sponsor so the fans who dont buy shirts with carlsberg over it will buy the shirt.

It isnt beyond the realms of possibility that a player will be signed who doesnt want to wear a shirt which promotes something against his beliefs.  What u going to say to him?  " :censored: off".  Sissoko could say it.   Kanoute said it at seville and they got him a shirt without 888.com on it.  Is this wrong?   Not at all.

What all this has to do with your flag story I have no  idea.

I see that thing call Racism still is ok to you.
User avatar
puroresu
 
Posts: 3070
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:30 am

Postby CUPWinner » Tue Dec 05, 2006 6:28 pm

Igor Zidane wrote:The EL ALI SAMMI ANNIE STADIUM has a nice ring to it don't yer think ?

Very welcoming for our new soon to be Islamic owners :D  ???

Galatasaray has just rejected an offer from U.A.E. just for the possibility of Islamic dictation. And for your information, the club is struggling with a huge debt account arround $200M. This is the thing that makes us big; traditional principles. I think LFC is not different and whoever the owner is, it won' t change!.. At least I hope so..

It' s wrong what you think. Turkiye is a strict secular republican country. Don' t get disillusioned by comparing us to Arabs. :no

Ali Sami Yen is not an Islamic name, it' s just one of regular ones and he is Galatasaray' s founder. Please pay some more attention for respect to his name.
There' s Nothing Impossible In The Lands of Galatasaray.
User avatar
CUPWinner
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 12:05 pm
Location: Istanbul

Postby Leonmc0708 » Tue Dec 05, 2006 6:31 pm

puroresu wrote:
Leonmc0708 wrote:
puroresu wrote:
The Manhattan Project wrote:Will the Arabs continue with Carlsberg as a sponsor?


I would be glad if Liverpool made tops avaliable without the Sponsor.  Rangers sell tops for there Muslim fans without Carling on them and and would be great if Liverpool did that.

Why ?

Thats football.

If you dont like it then dont follow it.

Does my head in all this.

You cant even have a St Georges flag i nyer garden incase you :censored: a paki off !!

What  is your problem.  I wasnt saying Liverpool must get rid of Carlsberg.  Like you said If I dont like it, dont buy it which I choose to not to do.

I just brought up the idea of LFC selling shirts with and without the sponsor so the fans who dont buy shirts with carlsberg over it will buy the shirt.

It isnt beyond the realms of possibility that a player will be signed who doesnt want to wear a shirt which promotes something against his beliefs.  What u going to say to him?  " :censored: off".  Sissoko could say it.   Kanoute said it at seville and they got him a shirt without 888.com on it.  Is this wrong?   Not at all.

What all this has to do with your flag story I have no  idea.

I see that thing call Racism still is ok to you.

Jump on the fu.cking racism badwagon why dont you ?

How is it remotely racist that a football club continues to do something it has done for ever and a day.
JUSTICE FOR THE 96

Image
User avatar
Leonmc0708
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 8420
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 11:44 am
Location: SEFTON SHED

Postby woof woof ! » Tue Dec 05, 2006 6:35 pm

The Manhattan Project wrote:Will the Arabs continue with Carlsberg as a sponsor?


:D  probably not , maybe we can look forward to this .

Image
Last edited by woof woof ! on Tue Dec 05, 2006 6:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Image
User avatar
woof woof !
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 21178
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:22 am
Location: Here There and Everywhere

PreviousNext

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 150 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e