bigmick wrote:Just a couple of things spring to mind here while I'm sweating me nuts off (it's about 33 degrees here today and fecking unbearable). Firstly, sorry in advance to Peewee and Bamaga, but I've got to stick up for Bob's tight to defend himself if somebody actually names him, refers to him in a post. He has a right to respond in my opinion, whether he is a mod or not. Just because you are a mod it doesn't or shouldn't mean that you can be criticised without having a right of reply. Apart from anything else it'd be fecking boring if people just had to take flack without giving some back.
Secondly, and I might as well fall out with everyone on the board practically while I'm at it. This thing of Leon, Stu's and now Peewee's about attending the games in order to have a clue is simply plain wrong, I've said it before and I'll say it again. Attending games does give you an insight which you are often unable to pick up off the telly, but even then you'd need to know what you're looking at. I'm not saying for a second that Leon, Stu and Peewee don't, but this idea that Anfield is filled with forty thousand experts a week is fantasy stuff to be honest. I think it's a bit too easy a retort, if you don't agree with something to use the "go to the game" angle.
All that said and thirdly, Peewee does have a point about the Alonso thing. Funnily enough I was just thinking the other day that when we went through our "blip", the anti-rotationers maintained all along that our reluctance to keep the semblence of a settled team and our eagerness to "rest" our best players was the overriding reason that we were in something of a "dip in form". (I keep puitting "blip" and other similar things in quotes because the reality is of course that it was much more than a blip, and it wasn't a dip in form we were playing absolutely awful). Anyhow, anti-rotationers were chided and assured that far from being the overiding reason, the team selections were merely one of a huge number of factors, and a pretty insignificant one at that.
"But Torres started against Porto and we didn't score then either

" it seems incredible when you think about it but some posters actually wrote that. The other factors of course at the time were Alonso's absense mainly, along with the loss of Agger, International breaks etc etc. Well since then neither of the aforementioned injured players have played a game, International breaks have come and gone and the team has low and behold found some form. Coincidently, Torres plays every game now and practically scores every game as well, similarly Gerrard. Masherano too almost always plays, and we almost always have the same central defensive partnership. It's not a "seeing of the light" from Rafa I'll grant you that, but there does seem to be a bit more common sense shown in most cases these days, with the obvious exception of Reading Away. So I repeat on the question of Alonso, such was the vehement criticism of anybody who dared to voice an opinion that he may not be Jesus christ reincarnated, it doesn't seem unreasonable to mention the fact that he hasn't played a part in our richest run of form under Rafa.