Bamaga man wrote:dawson99 wrote:Kuyt is not ineffective, he does a lot against the defence to give others more space. and he is like an extra midfielder when he is running after the ball
Agreed, but thats what I'm getting at. I'm not saying he's ineffective, but I think he should apply himself more in the 18 yard box instead of helping the midfield out 70% of the time.
puroresu wrote:Kuyt is very good. Like Morientes, Kuyt is asked to do a lot of stuff which doesn’t get the best out of him. i.e. drop very deep, playing with back to goal. Kuyt will always do his fair share of work but playing like that he won’t score the goals his workrate deserves.
Bamaga man wrote:puroresu wrote:Kuyt is very good. Like Morientes, Kuyt is asked to do a lot of stuff which doesn’t get the best out of him. i.e. drop very deep, playing with back to goal. Kuyt will always do his fair share of work but playing like that he won’t score the goals his workrate deserves.
Agreed.
babu wrote:Whoa Bamaga man, didn't you take your pills today? {jokes}
I don't believe Kuyt will be a 20+ striker, at least not with this current squad. Then again i am not sure many predicted he would be. Out of the strikers we have, when we play 2 upfront i would always want one of them to be Kuyt.
He is just works a lot harder and is always looking to create something. We do however need all-out traditional striker. One that is super selfish and super clinical in front of goal. Don't any of our strikers (excepting Fowler) fits that bill.
You were not trying to bag Kuyt, but i would like to say anyway that he is a fine addition to the squad and one of our better signings recently.
puroresu wrote:Kuyt is asked to do a lot of stuff which doesn’t get the best out of him. i.e. drop very deep, playing with back to goal. .
babu wrote:puroresu wrote:Kuyt is asked to do a lot of stuff which doesn’t get the best out of him. i.e. drop very deep, playing with back to goal. .
Don't get me wrong, but what you say there is a classic wind-up. You state as fact, something minor, that you can't possibly know, then base conclusions on it.
It worries me that you do that.
crouchaldinho wrote:I can appreciate where you're coming from, but i think that the game has changed a lot in recent years, and strikers are now expected to drop a bit deeper and link up play a bit more than they used to be. I think this is probably one of the main reasons that we see a lot more goalscoring midfielders these days. The fact that a striker is dropping a bit deeper sometimes pulls defenders out of position which opens up space for marauding runs into the box from the likes of Gerrard.
Dont get me wrong, i know that even in days of old midfielders scored goals, but i would say its a lot more commonplace in recent seasons - for example, the two most highly rated midfielders in the country (Gerrard & Fat Frank from chavski) scored over 40 goals between them in all competitions last season. I think that illustrates my point to a certain extent
dawson99 wrote:but he has essien and makelele behind him who both play out of there skin, and they only really play one up front
puroresu wrote:babu wrote:puroresu wrote:Kuyt is asked to do a lot of stuff which doesn’t get the best out of him. i.e. drop very deep, playing with back to goal. .
Don't get me wrong, but what you say there is a classic wind-up. You state as fact, something minor, that you can't possibly know, then base conclusions on it.
It worries me that you do that.
Im just making comparisons to how he played at Feynoord till how he plays at Liverpool.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 81 guests