metalhead wrote:aCe' wrote:you know, i dont think the whole team is awful... I think the back 4 are excellent, Smalling is having an excellent tournament and he'll probably go on to become the best CB in the country in the next couple of years. Miles ahead of P.Jons for me. The 2 fullbacks (Walker and Bertrand) have done well and look decent. The middle is where they really struggle. Mancienne/Muamba do a job defensively but lack the quality to contribute in building up play. Henderson doesnt show for the ball enough for me and has been disappointing in the few occasions he got on the ball. The wide players have some talent but are nothing spectacular (Sinclair and Cleverly) . Upfront theres Welback and Sturridge who are both excellent players imo who would get into most sides in the league (outside the top4)...
The manager is somewhat clueless and the midfield is letting the side down... Henderson, regardless of the hype and him signing for us, has been very disappointing.
Henderson is playing in holding role which limits his ability to go forward, the whole team plays a direct kind of football and that is why England can't hold possession, its not Henderson's fault. If the team has excellent players then why are they struggling to beat an average Czech team?
He's playing a central midfield role not a holding role. He does get forward but his positioning and off the ball movement have been very poor. His role dictates him showing up for wide players more often to aid the transition but he hasnt been able to do that.
I was desperately waiting for Pearce to move him to the flank and bring Lansburry on to play a midfield role. Has more mobility than Henderson and would allow JH to connect better with K.Walker who probably saw more of the ball than any other player on the pitch in all 3 games.
Hes still young, improving, and will play alongside better players for Liverpool and all that. This tournament however, he's been poor by any standards..