aCe' wrote:- one last thing... i hear many talking about our defense being the main reason why we are where we are... Taking all the blame off the likes of Kuyt and Lucas simply because they arent defenders .. I think our main problem hasnt simply been our back 4 in terms of personnel, its been the system as a whole... As mentioned above, Lucas was always going to be the center of attention given the position he plays... With the 2 attacking fullbacks and 5 in the middle we were always going to play a patient attacking game with much focus on possession and wearing other sides down... We simply havent been able to do that... Werent dominant enough and we were made to pay for it... Dont get me wrong, the defense has been a shambles, but i blame the central midfielders and wingers just as much for failing to take some of the pressure off our back 4 in many occasions...
Scottbot wrote:It's a good shout mate, i've been bemoaning our defence for a while now but there is no doubt that it is a collective responsibility. Of course, we've missed Alonso's tackles which were by far the most overlooked aspect of his game, throw in the fact we aren't keeping the ball like we used to, Johnson is not the defender that Arbeloa was, Insua for all his potential is not as solid as the oft injured Aurelio, kuyt has looked tired and i think teams seem to be less worried about coming at us these past 10 games.
Igor Zidane wrote:Not going to do that russian doll quote thing and i don't know how to do what scotts just done above .
SO THIS IS FOR YOU ACE![]()
Lucas has been one of our most consistantly better players this season . I totally disagree with you comments regarding him .If he put away his chances we'd all be singing his praises now , he's afar better player that youn and many others give him credit for .
Again you blame Lucas for our defensive frailties ,but that's so unfair . Lucas is trying to be a up and down midfielder and not a sitter like mascherano , he's getting better and better at it . The defense has been poor this season , but i'd lay that squarley at the defenders feet and injuries of course .
The reason no back up for torres was bought was money plain and simple . Rafa had spent his quota on Johnson (top buy) and Aqualani(don't know yet ) to replace alonso . He was selling Voronin and THe doss ,but he was'snt guaranteed the dosh for new players . So he had to keep them . Sami wanted more than a one year deal and rafa wasn't prepared to offer him more ,so with what little money he had left he bought the greek . Yer get what you pay for .
Why break the Torres /Gerrard partnership up that has worked so well ,it doesn't make sense . They 've both been injured so that's been taken out of Rafa's hands anyway .
Reira when fit (not a lot ) has been poorley out of form for about 3-4 months , although he does bring balance to the side . So why start him if he bring nothing to the side in an attacking sense .
The kuyt bit i agree with , except that i'd have him in every time ahead of the likes of Babel and Vorinin , because you know your going 100% every game from him .. Not always quality but , works and tries his bollox off .
Bad Bob wrote:Scottbot wrote:It's a good shout mate, i've been bemoaning our defence for a while now but there is no doubt that it is a collective responsibility. Of course, we've missed Alonso's tackles which were by far the most overlooked aspect of his game, throw in the fact we aren't keeping the ball like we used to, Johnson is not the defender that Arbeloa was, Insua for all his potential is not as solid as the oft injured Aurelio, kuyt has looked tired and i think teams seem to be less worried about coming at us these past 10 games.
Scott, do you think Johnson has been poor defending this season or is a situation where he leaves Carra more exposed than Arbeloa did? I must say that I've been impressed with his defending this season. Perhaps that has much to do with a lack of expectation, as the main talking when we signed him is that he's great going forward but prone to lapses at the back. Well, I haven't seen too many lapses to be perfectly honest. I think he's a lot more accomplished at defending than some give him credit for. With that said, there's no doubt he pours forward more than Arbeloa ever did and that will open some gaps at the back.
Igor Zidane wrote:Not going to do that russian doll quote thing and i don't know how to do what scotts just done above .
SO THIS IS FOR YOU ACE![]()
Lucas has been one of our most consistantly better players this season . I totally disagree with you comments regarding him .If he put away his chances we'd all be singing his praises now , he's afar better player that youn and many others give him credit for .
Again you blame Lucas for our defensive frailties ,but that's so unfair . Lucas is trying to be a up and down midfielder and not a sitter like mascherano , he's getting better and better at it . The defense has been poor this season , but i'd lay that squarley at the defenders feet and injuries of course .
The reason no back up for torres was bought was money plain and simple . Rafa had spent his quota on Johnson (top buy) and Aqualani(don't know yet ) to replace alonso . He was selling Voronin and THe doss ,but he was'snt guaranteed the dosh for new players . So he had to keep them . Sami wanted more than a one year deal and rafa wasn't prepared to offer him more ,so with what little money he had left he bought the greek . Yer get what you pay for .
Why break the Torres /Gerrard partnership up that has worked so well ,it doesn't make sense . They 've both been injured so that's been taken out of Rafa's hands anyway .
Reira when fit (not a lot ) has been poorley out of form for about 3-4 months , although he does bring balance to the side . So why start him if he bring nothing to the side in an attacking sense .
The kuyt bit i agree with , except that i'd have him in every time ahead of the likes of Babel and Vorinin , because you know your going 100% every game from him .. Not always quality but , works and tries his bollox off .
LFC2007 wrote:I'm not so sure how much of this analysis is based on evidence or just theory. For example if it's true that Johnson's attacking style of play has left the relatively slow Carra/Skrtel/Agger/Grock badly exposed, surely it's possible to cite a few examples of how this supposed imbalance has cost us in terms of goals conceded? If we're debating theory then I suppose you could equally contend that Johnson's pace enables him to recover and snuff out danger on the break, providing flexibility to an otherwise inflexible backline. I can certainly recall more of that (e.g. Villa at home, Spurs away) than this supposed 'exposure', but then again the game moves very fast and there's lots of events in each game to keep note of...and so it ain't easy whoever you are.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 108 guests