by LFC2007 » Sun May 25, 2008 6:36 pm
First off, stability at boardroom level is a requisite for any football club looking to win titles. We haven't found that yet, and that's as key to our future as the manager. In order to acquire sufficient quality you generally need significant funds, and without boardroom consensus, it's very difficult to move forward on that level.
I don't believe the Manc's were some wonderful unbeatable team last season, but I think they were easily the most complete team in Europe.
The EPL is the toughest league in the world to win. You've Chelsea spending tens of millions willy nilly every year, you've Arsenal who've gradually built a philosophy and scouting network that ensures they'll always be a threat, then you have the Manc's who have the spending power to match anyone, and the continutity and experience of Ferguson.
IMO, Wenger and Ferguson are the world's two best club managers. When Mourinho was at Chelsea, there was a legitimate case to say the EPL possessed the world's three best club managers.
That epitomises the strength in depth of the EPL, even with Mourinho now gone it's arguably become even stronger, and subsequently a tougher division to conquer.
Having placed the size of the job in its relevant context, I'd still have expected us to have mounted a stronger challenge for the title by now. Opportunities, though few, have arisen, and passed us by where we could've strengthened particular areas of the squad with sufficient quality, which probably would've helped us in our quest to challenge for the title*.
I've agonised over my views as to whether Rafa is the correct man for the job, it's not some blind view taken without consideration - as some would have you believe.
My view is that, when considering the state of the club upon his arrival, when considering the level of player available to us in the transfer market and the incompetence of Rick Parry, when considering boardroom instability, and the relative increase in strength of our competitors, he has faired pretty well and overall has done a good job.
I can't say whether this should be his last chance, or otherwise, but the alternatives to him, IMO, are few and far between. I really can't say I'd want any of Europe's supposed 'top managers' such as Rijkaard, Mancini, Ancelotti, Schuster, ahead of Rafa. I certainly don't see any of them managing to break up the dominance of the Manc's and Chelsea, and reckon one or two would get a hell of a surprise coming to this league. Mourinho, there's a case for him for sure, but at present if I was to weigh up whether or not I'd rather stick with Rafa or opt for a change I'd stick with Rafa for the reason that he has the faith of his players, and the risk of breaking up the core of a good side is too great. Ultimately it depends on how we fare this season and how well or poor we perform, and also who we sign this summer. Torres, as far as I'm concerned, was last seasons mark of progress for us. He, along with the consolidation of Mascherano as core players, demonstrated a degree of progress sufficient for me to accept we are moving in the right direction.
*As an act of appeasement I'll factor in a minute amount of "Rafa style" vis-a-vis formation change/players in incorrect positions to account in part for our inability to sustain a challenge for the title.