by ivor_the_injun » Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:04 am
Rio was awesome in the 2002 World Cup. Absolutely no doubt about that. Quite why Sol Campbell got into the "team of the tournament" and not him I have no idea.
I also take your point that part of his game is setting up goals.
However, he's a defender, and as such I judge him primarily on his defending. He's excellent in the air, he's good on the deck, he's pacey, strong, physical and basically he's got everything he needs for the position that he plays. Unfortunately, he's also a f*cking flash b*stard. Sometimes I watch him and it looks like he's listened to every single nice word that's ever been said about him without taking on any of the criticism.
I know you're no great lover of John Terry, but I'm actually a big fan of his, and it's because he gets right everything that Rio gets wrong. He's got EXACTLY the right approach in terms of starting it simple from the back and worrying about trying something a bit more complicated once cover's there, and he's got the space to get away with it. He's not as good with the ball at his feet, but he's generally the more solid defender of the two. He's also a player that's still getting better, whereas I feel Ferdinand will never again be as good as he was 4 years ago.
I think it's safe to say that, over the last year, Rio Ferdinand would have got the England team into a hell of a lot more trouble for some of the faults I've already mentioned were it not for the interventions of John Terry in cleaning up his mess.