by red37 » Wed Sep 05, 2007 3:35 pm
Should Gerrard get the needle?
Euro 2008 England
by Phil McNulty - BBC Sport 05 September 2007
England's hopes of Euro 2008 qualification appear to be balanced precariously on the end of Steven Gerrard's toe.
To inject or not to inject? That is the question that is currently rivalling the previous pains various metatarsals have caused to England's managerial regime.
Gerrard is vital to England's cause. He is even more important to Liverpool - so who will win the latest battle between club and country?
Coach Steve McClaren seems willing to give Gerrard a pain-killing injection to ensure he plays against Israel, in defiance of Liverpool boss Rafael Benitez's wishes.
It is an indicator of the importance of the upcoming games against Israel and Russia that Gerrard's absence cannot be countenanced by McClaren.
It is also a sign of how far England's stock has fallen that players need to be injected to give McClaren a greater sense of security against a nation that is hardly one of football's giants.
England should be able to beat Israel with or without Steven Gerrard - but it seems they can't.
This, in itself, is worrying for England and McClaren.
The Gerrard situation is fraught with risk, both in terms of his own fitness and the delicate relationship between club and country.
And it is easy to see both sides of the argument.
McClaren's own future is on the line if he fails to get results in the next week.
And robbed of Wayne Rooney, Frank Lampard and David Beckham, it is easy to see why he does not want to lose Gerrard.
McClaren, rightly, has only England in his sights but will be aware of the potentially frosty reception any jab at Gerrard's toe will receive at Anfield.
At Anfield, Benitez has overseen Liverpool's best start for years and understandably does not want to see a major part of their title challenge sacrificed on the altar of England's Euro 2008 challenge.
Liverpool and their supporters - completely understandably in my view - don't give the proverbial about England and will be infuriated by any unnecessary risks McClaren may care to take.
No "Three Lions" for them. They only care about the Liver Bird and my sympathies, in this instance, lie with them.
McClaren may counter that Benitez was happy to see Gerrard receive an injection in his troublesome toe before the game against Chelsea recently.
But Liverpool's answer to that will be that, unlike the Football Association, he is their employee and is paid £100,000-plus weekly for the privilege.
And Benitez was very quick to point out that it took Gerrard four days to return to training after that game.
My own view is that if England feel they have to send a patched-up and injected Gerrard out to feel confident of beating Israel, then it is a sad reflection on the rest of the squad.
The final decision must surely, however, have to come from Gerrard himself.
If he is happy with his fitness, and happy there are no long-term risks, then he should play.
But in the back of his mind - make that front of his mind - at all times should be an image of Benitez's face if this back-fires.
It would not be pretty being Gerrard or McClaren if he plays when less than 100% fit and is subsequently sidelined for Liverpool.
Benitez is not a man to cross and is not a respecter of reputations, Gerrard's or anyone elses.
It would be an interesting, and potentially very one-sided, conversation should Gerrard report back to Liverpool's Melwood training base having aggravated his injury.
These are all factors that Gerrard must weigh up, because in the end it will be his decision.
***********************************************
We know the right thing to do...McLaren doesn't have any choice - Beckham saved England against Greece at OT. Gerrard is being put under the same expectations here....Question is, how much does the Liverpool captain want it. And we know the answer to that too, unfortunately.
Lap of the Gods this one.
TITANS of HOPE