by bigmick » Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:15 pm
I've said it a few times now, the reason why you pay managers huge sums of money is so they get big decisions right. Not only do they get them right, they get them right quickly. That's why Rafa earns more in a week than most of us do in a year.
Now here's a question. Once we'd sold Alonso, and once we'd decided to sign an injured replacement, what would have been the best course of action? I'll give you a possibility or an option if you prefer. How about we DECIDE AT THAT POINT that until Aquilani comes back, Gerrard must play in central midfield. Given that, we also decide to blood Benayoun/Babel as the support striker. Houston, we have a plan. In pre-season games we actually give it a bit of a whirl, and then when the season starts proper that's what we do. Gerrard plays central midfield with either Masherano or Lucas.
Is there anybody in the Universe who doesn't think this would have been the best way to go? Yes people aren't going to applaud your astuteness and tell you how clever you are because it's a fairly obvious move. We know that Gerrard is a World Class central midfielder with bags of attacking intent, so it's a natural match between him and Masherano or Lucas.
Instead of that though, what do we do? We start the season with Gerrard up top, Masherano/Lucas in midfield and lose two out of our first three matches (after jolly-ups galore pre season which did nobody any favours). Realising we have a problem, we switch Gerrard back into midfield and bingo! Suddenly it all clicks and we muller everyone we play. Then, after four wins on the bounce or whatever it was we decide to switch it back again. We lose the next two matches 2-0 and look a shadow of the free flowing unit seen in the previous matches.
Top managers get big decisions right often. They don't make obvious mistakes often. Is this an example of top management, of tactical genius, or something else? I know what I think, what about you?
"se e in una bottigla ed e bianco, e latte".