Liverpool FC Forum

[Roger Red Hat]

I've just been into my works toilet and someone has been for a dump and not flushed it!   turd sat looking at me - long as a babies arm it was and twice as thick.

now thats poo.

thanks for reminding me daws

[neil]

Bring back the hustler & liverpoolanytime, then we'll see proper abuse, none of this candy ar5ed handbag sh1t.

[dawson99]

I've just been into my works toilet and someone has been for a dump and not flushed it!   turd sat looking at me - long as a babies arm it was and twice as thick.

now thats poo.

thanks for reminding me daws

Why are you measuring poo's against baby's arms? Where is this baby? don't sound right to me

[Quadrophenia]

Good to see how this has become a real well thought out discussion on the on-goings of Liverpool Football Club, which last time I checked was what The Kop board is for which again last time I checked was where this thread was. Decent enough request, should then have been locked or added to the general rules.

There's no need for a debate, certainly not in an area designed to debate Liverpool, about something like this. You post it, I think half the forum users have posted a similar message somewhere on the forum of late, and then that's it. If people don't take any notice then you get what you've got, a very badly used forum which is a shame considering some of the users on here. This place has some great posters like me and erm...well OK you have me...must be more surely. I'll think of one... nope still struggling to find one beyond me. Anyway there's no need for 7 pages, on something so obvious.

A moderator makes a request, all is okey doke, if people don't ahear to that then the moderator takes further action, surely that's the simple way of doing things without having all this nonesense. You want a politely used forum, fair enough that's not difficult to expect, if people aren't polite then kick the out. It's hardly mind bending, then you're left with the decent and respected members who still won't agree so there'll still be some decent debates. If people moan why was such and such banned you tell them straight "such and such didn't ahear to the rules, in terms of basic manners." Lets be honest manners are much more important than text speech which is banged on about far too often. Somebody uses text language, bang the entire place is up in arms, somebody calls another memeber a queer and all is okey doke. That's why this place has fallen flat on it's over the past six to twelve months, it's run badly. This by the way isn't a slagging off of the moderators here, it's for all concerned because basic manners are not something somebody on the internet should have to tell you about. People's own self moderating is just a joke at times, moderators included in that by the way. Then it gets into a pathetic arguement which nobody actually has a clue what the arguement is about. So instead of getting the two (or more) members involved and giving them a simple explaination of what's wrong, it goes on for days/weeks/months until the point of cards being thrown round when nobody has a explaination of what they've done wrong. Badly ran.

Things need to be nipped in the bud much quicker than what they are, then you'll get less aggro. If you explain, rasionally and not in the petulant way some use, you'll get less aggro. If people persist to ignore the warnings then you shouldn't even bother with one card, simply ban them. If they're ruining the forum for so many, which seems to be the case on here of late, what difference is a little yellow card going to make? Ban those who are purposely creating problems and aren't allowing the debates about Liverpool Football Club expand into something that everybody enjoys. There's some on here who love nothing more than a good, well balanced arguement from somebody who sits on the opposite side to them on for example Steven Gerrard's best position. Unfortunately because of the way people are allowed to get away with blue (or should that be red considering it's a Liverpool forum) murder before any serious action is taken the will to even try debating gets less and less for some.

So in conclusion it should be:
1) state that no name calling will be tollerated.
2) if somebody fails this rule, they get a warning via a pm explaining why they're being warned
3) if the same person fails the rule again they get banned. (don't know if this place has various lenghts on bans, but if not it should)
4) you give them one final chance after a three-day ban and if it persists they get banned for good and account cancled.
5) i become prime minister are declare war on america.

5 simple steps to a happier newkit.

Trust me to sort out the problems. Everbody knew I was right all along, just some wouldn't admit it.

[Leonmc0708]

its not as if your life revolves around newkit.

Really ?

[Madmax]

So in conclusion it should be:
1) state that no name calling will be tollerated.
2) if somebody fails this rule, they get a warning via a pm explaining why they're being warned
3) if the same person fails the rule again they get banned. (don't know if this place has various lenghts on bans, but if not it should)
4) you give them one final chance after a three-day ban and if it persists they get banned for good and account cancled.
5) i become prime minister are declare war on america.

5 simple steps to a happier newkit.

Hope your reading these rules bavlondon . Bavvy insults me all the time calles me a jinxer. Im on the verge of suicide.   

[Judge]

why have we a canadian as mod anyway. i mean they cant even make proper chips