Judge wrote:bring in aaron lennon, he can play anywhere across midfield or the wing, plus he's very technically good
The Kid Torres wrote:Judge wrote:bring in aaron lennon, he can play anywhere across midfield or the wing, plus he's very technically good
I think technically Lennon is extremely average at best at this moment in time.
He has fantastic pace which of course can be a real asset but too many times he runs down blind alleys, and when he does get to the byline his final ball is often lacking. His scoring record is poor to compared to s lot of other wide players.
He does have potential but I think there are better, and probably cheaper, options out there.
Toffeehater wrote:The Kid Torres wrote:Judge wrote:bring in aaron lennon, he can play anywhere across midfield or the wing, plus he's very technically good
I think technically Lennon is extremely average at best at this moment in time.
He has fantastic pace which of course can be a real asset but too many times he runs down blind alleys, and when he does get to the byline his final ball is often lacking. His scoring record is poor to compared to s lot of other wide players.
He does have potential but I think there are better, and probably cheaper, options out there.
firstly , there are not many wingers who get loads of goals , ronaldo may be an expection , football has changed , wingers don't score that many now compared to last time . I think lennon would be a fantastic addition to the sqaud and is a naturla winger , great pace , has great skill to beat his man.
Would u suggest some better options which meet ur criteria
The Kid Torres wrote:Toffeehater wrote:The Kid Torres wrote:Judge wrote:bring in aaron lennon, he can play anywhere across midfield or the wing, plus he's very technically good
I think technically Lennon is extremely average at best at this moment in time.
He has fantastic pace which of course can be a real asset but too many times he runs down blind alleys, and when he does get to the byline his final ball is often lacking. His scoring record is poor to compared to s lot of other wide players.
He does have potential but I think there are better, and probably cheaper, options out there.
firstly , there are not many wingers who get loads of goals , ronaldo may be an expection , football has changed , wingers don't score that many now compared to last time . I think lennon would be a fantastic addition to the sqaud and is a naturla winger , great pace , has great skill to beat his man.
Would u suggest some better options which meet ur criteria
Van Der Vaart and David Bentley are two players that spring to mind.
I know there not out and out wingers in the slightest BUT they both cross the ball better than Aaron Lennon, which is one of a winger's priorities, and both likely to get into double figures over the season.
If Lennon was to leave Spurs it would likely to be for no less than 18 million, far too much money for a hit and miss type of player.
Toffeehater wrote:The Kid Torres wrote:Toffeehater wrote:The Kid Torres wrote:Judge wrote:bring in aaron lennon, he can play anywhere across midfield or the wing, plus he's very technically good
I think technically Lennon is extremely average at best at this moment in time.
He has fantastic pace which of course can be a real asset but too many times he runs down blind alleys, and when he does get to the byline his final ball is often lacking. His scoring record is poor to compared to s lot of other wide players.
He does have potential but I think there are better, and probably cheaper, options out there.
firstly , there are not many wingers who get loads of goals , ronaldo may be an expection , football has changed , wingers don't score that many now compared to last time . I think lennon would be a fantastic addition to the sqaud and is a naturla winger , great pace , has great skill to beat his man.
Would u suggest some better options which meet ur criteria
Van Der Vaart and David Bentley are two players that spring to mind.
I know there not out and out wingers in the slightest BUT they both cross the ball better than Aaron Lennon, which is one of a winger's priorities, and both likely to get into double figures over the season.
If Lennon was to leave Spurs it would likely to be for no less than 18 million, far too much money for a hit and miss type of player.
van der vart plays as a second foward or a central mid . BEntely would go for 15 million at least and not really sure he can cut it at a big club like he messed up at arsenal , secondly lennon would cost only 6 to 8 million , a rumour that rafa would bid ain that region and it would tempt ramos who's gonna clear alot of players in the summer and needs the funds with one of spurs shareholders suffering a lost , so this might affect their transfer budget , so he would not be looking at bids that high for players
stmichael wrote:I actually think Dirk Kuyt has played very well since shifting to this current formation and has become far more of a goal threat as a result. The role Rafa is asking him to play requires high workrate and the ability to get into the box when we attack, something Kuyt is doing very well at the moment.
The Kid Torres wrote:Judge wrote:bring in aaron lennon, he can play anywhere across midfield or the wing, plus he's very technically good
I think technically Lennon is extremely average at best at this moment in time.
He has fantastic pace which of course can be a real asset but too many times he runs down blind alleys, and when he does get to the byline his final ball is often lacking. His scoring record is poor to compared to s lot of other wide players.
He does have potential but I think there are better, and probably cheaper, options out there.
Owzat wrote:The Kid Torres wrote:Judge wrote:bring in aaron lennon, he can play anywhere across midfield or the wing, plus he's very technically good
I think technically Lennon is extremely average at best at this moment in time.
He has fantastic pace which of course can be a real asset but too many times he runs down blind alleys, and when he does get to the byline his final ball is often lacking. His scoring record is poor to compared to s lot of other wide players.
He does have potential but I think there are better, and probably cheaper, options out there.
I haven't been that impressed with Lennon, maybe a step up from Pennant, but still not anywhere near as good as he should be by now. He's almost become peripheral in England terms. If we could buy him at £4m-£5m then maybe he's worth the gamble, spudz would not sell him cheaply (saying that Ramos might)
Premiership comparisons (source : FPL)
Lennon - 2 goals and 4 assists in 1683 mins
Bentley - 6 goals and 6 assists in 2600 mins
Pennant - 1 goal and 2 assists in 881 mins
Babel - 4 goals and 3 assists in 1091 mins
So Lennon is on double the goals and assists of Pennant and roughly double the minutes, Babel and Bentley look the better of the four by far. To be able to compare Pennant and Lennon fairly and conclude there's little between them in terms of end produce suggests we'd be buying someone little better than Pennant and doubtless at the same cost or probably more.
The Kid Torres wrote:Owzat wrote:The Kid Torres wrote:Judge wrote:bring in aaron lennon, he can play anywhere across midfield or the wing, plus he's very technically good
I think technically Lennon is extremely average at best at this moment in time.
He has fantastic pace which of course can be a real asset but too many times he runs down blind alleys, and when he does get to the byline his final ball is often lacking. His scoring record is poor to compared to s lot of other wide players.
He does have potential but I think there are better, and probably cheaper, options out there.
I haven't been that impressed with Lennon, maybe a step up from Pennant, but still not anywhere near as good as he should be by now. He's almost become peripheral in England terms. If we could buy him at £4m-£5m then maybe he's worth the gamble, spudz would not sell him cheaply (saying that Ramos might)
Premiership comparisons (source : FPL)
Lennon - 2 goals and 4 assists in 1683 mins
Bentley - 6 goals and 6 assists in 2600 mins
Pennant - 1 goal and 2 assists in 881 mins
Babel - 4 goals and 3 assists in 1091 mins
So Lennon is on double the goals and assists of Pennant and roughly double the minutes, Babel and Bentley look the better of the four by far. To be able to compare Pennant and Lennon fairly and conclude there's little between them in terms of end produce suggests we'd be buying someone little better than Pennant and doubtless at the same cost or probably more.![]()
That's the point I was making, that Lennon isn't actually that much a different player to Jermiane Pennant. (although he might be much better in a few years should he develop a final ball even half of what Cristiano Ronaldo has)
Lennon has been poor this season compared to the last one and it's not a suprise to see him not only fail to make Cappello's England squad so far but also the under-21 squad too.
I would be over the moon if Liverpool signed David Bentley. People dislike him as he's arrogant but all the special players have that arrogance to there game and whilst he's still got to prove himself on the top stage he has massive potential and Torres would thrive on his crosses and set-pieces.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 37 guests