by Octsky » Thu Oct 01, 2009 6:51 am
No to playing 3 centre backs, the 442 was formed to counter 3-5-2 or 5-3-2.
If the opposition played 2 CF, we have 2 CB marking him, leaving 1 of our CB redundant. Worst still if they played 1 CF, we will have 2 CB being redundant.
Been noticing now the trend of playing 433, Cheals did it for some seasons, then Mancs, Barca, and recently RM scums.
The benefits of 433 vs 442; 2 wingers attacking our flanks preventing our full backs from overlapping upfield. Their full backs will take out our wingers,
Torres and Gerrard (as a AM/CF) being marked by their 2 CB, They outplayed us in the middle, 3 is to 2. Their 1 CF being man-marked by our 1 CB, leaving another 1 CB free and not contributing much towards the bigger picture.
And lets bring it up another level, given Skrtel being the "free CB",
what can he do?
lets see: 1) go for the same ball with Carra and head the ball towards the opposition within the 12 yards box (2) commit dangerous fouls (3) lose possession in midfield (4) hitting mistimed shots and headers