Bamaga man wrote:Liverpool are so boring to watch, yawn yawn!!!! Kuyt is s*i*e.
s@int wrote:Bamaga man wrote:Liverpool are so boring to watch, yawn yawn!!!! Kuyt is s*i*e.
I wasn't bored by todays game mate, bit disappointed with our play but not bored. I don't think we are that far off playing well at the moment. A bit more creativity in the final third , a bit more pace up front and a bit more snap in our passing and we will be up and running.
Think back to a few games ago, we couldn't pass, players were like statues, all we had to offer was hard work and effort, and even the effort didn't seem that great.
I think we are gradually getting back on track. While I appreciate Blackburn didn't try to pressurise us on the ball today and were quite happy to let us pass it about, we showed signs that our confidence is starting to come back.
I think Rafa made a big big mistake not buying a winger instead of Babel. Kewell did nothing out of the ordinary, just held the ball well passed ok and got a few decent crosses in, but the difference in our play was clear for anyone to see.
Babel may turn into a great player one day (unlikely I know but possible) but we have been crying out for a decent winger, and Babel is just not good enough as a winger. If a cameo from a half fit Kewell can have that sort of impact, just think if we had signed Mancini or Maluda.
I thought Mascherano had a great game again, but I think our fullbacks suffered without Alonso's quick passes. Or maybe it was Blackburns game plan to snuff out our fullbacks?
I agree about Kuyt, he certainly proved that he's not good enough to play the main striker, and that its not because he has been playing too deep that he doesn't score.
The only time Kuyt offered any threat or looked comfortable was when he dropped back into his usual position. Having said that, why did we keep chipping balls up to him all the first half? He never won a ball in the air so why keep doing it?
Nah mate I wasn't bored, I wasn't exactly thrilled either, but it will come.
Owzat wrote:Why did we need Sissoko AND Mascherano again? It's not like they stopped Blackburn getting chances and maybe with another more attacking option we'd SCORE.
Some say it was Crouch coming on changed the outlook, I'd say it was the fact that we had two up front
bigmick wrote:Rafa will know in his heart of hearts as we all surely do, that a serious tilt at the title is looking like an unlikely turn of events.
Owzat wrote:I'm sorry but we're unbeaten and not having a serious tilt at the title even though we're only six points off the top?!?!?! Not having a go at you, but what situation will we be looking at a serious tilt at the title? Is it only when we've won our first nine or ten league games? We could have won yesterday and probably should have, if we're conceding the title already then I have to wonder if this is the same Liverpool I have supported for over TWENTY years. We're not in a perfect position, but we're better off than any of the 10 points out of 21 starts we've had under Rafa (all three previous seasons)
bigmick wrote:As for your point Ows' about Crouch, it's certainly fair to say the inclusion of a second striker almost regardless of who it was changed the shape of the play. So inoccuous though was Kuyt before the introduction of Crouch, that the substitute was made to look like some sort of world-beater simply because he won a header or two and actually carried some sort of tangible threat. I know from your previously well-researched posts that you don't rate Crouch at all, but I'd be interested to hear who you would start with up top given Torres isn't available and the other options are Voronin and Kuyt (assuming of course he won't play Babel there which seemingly he won't). Though you don't rate Crouch, would you still concede he's the best of the other three?
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 63 guests