Effes wrote:Keane should have started, defo. Not too concerned about Riera not starting.
why to reward poor form what a joke give babel a start ffs it makes sense.
Effes wrote:Keane should have started, defo. Not too concerned about Riera not starting.
metalhead wrote:INSUA STARTS!!!
LegBarnes wrote:Effes wrote:Keane should have started, defo. Not too concerned about Riera not starting.
why to reward poor form what a joke give babel a start ffs it makes sense.
Effes wrote:LegBarnes wrote:Effes wrote:Keane should have started, defo. Not too concerned about Riera not starting.
why to reward poor form what a joke give babel a start ffs it makes sense.
I honestly dont know what that sentence means/implies.
Im OK with riera on for Babel, but I would have had keane up
front.
I wouldn't have Kuyt upfront on his own, no way.
LegBarnes wrote:Effes wrote:LegBarnes wrote:Effes wrote:Keane should have started, defo. Not too concerned about Riera not starting.
why to reward poor form what a joke give babel a start ffs it makes sense.
I honestly dont know what that sentence means/implies.
Im OK with riera on for Babel, but I would have had keane up
front.
I wouldn't have Kuyt upfront on his own, no way.
So you play babel as wide left even tho he is striker ?
Just like rafa you are clueless.
Babel is a striker not a winger I think what he has shown in that area has proven that.
If he does do well from wide left it be from him cutting into central areas and thats only reason.
Babel just don't have a great left foot.
Effes wrote:LegBarnes wrote:Effes wrote:LegBarnes wrote:Effes wrote:Keane should have started, defo. Not too concerned about Riera not starting.
why to reward poor form what a joke give babel a start ffs it makes sense.
I honestly dont know what that sentence means/implies.
Im OK with riera on for Babel, but I would have had keane up
front.
I wouldn't have Kuyt upfront on his own, no way.
So you play babel as wide left even tho he is striker ?
Just like rafa you are clueless.
Babel is a striker not a winger I think what he has shown in that area has proven that.
If he does do well from wide left it be from him cutting into central areas and thats only reason.
Babel just don't have a great left foot.
Radio City (if you didnt know, radio station in Liverpool) are saying that it's Kuyt up front.
If Babel IS on the laft with Kuyt up front; then Im afraid it just
highlights your spasticated posts.
LegBarnes wrote:Effes wrote:LegBarnes wrote:Effes wrote:LegBarnes wrote:Effes wrote:Keane should have started, defo. Not too concerned about Riera not starting.
why to reward poor form what a joke give babel a start ffs it makes sense.
I honestly dont know what that sentence means/implies.
Im OK with riera on for Babel, but I would have had keane up
front.
I wouldn't have Kuyt upfront on his own, no way.
So you play babel as wide left even tho he is striker ?
Just like rafa you are clueless.
Babel is a striker not a winger I think what he has shown in that area has proven that.
If he does do well from wide left it be from him cutting into central areas and thats only reason.
Babel just don't have a great left foot.
Radio City (if you didnt know, radio station in Liverpool) are saying that it's Kuyt up front.
If Babel IS on the laft with Kuyt up front; then Im afraid it just
highlights your spasticated posts.
No it highlights every thing i said is right , Rafa don't understand what babels stenghts are clearly niether do you .
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Feedfetcher and 106 guests