by banana » Fri Jun 10, 2005 4:38 pm
I must say I'm really surprised after reading through this thread. It seems more than 90% of the people participating in the discussion are against Baros. Then he must be a bad player, right? Or is the majority wrong?
Based on goal statistics Baros has not impressed. He has 9 league goals in 22 starts. Not super, but decent enough I guess.
What more can statistics say? He has won us 65 free kicks, not bad I must say, a lot of them in dangerous positions. His good control and work rate make him a hard player to handle for defenders. They often pull him to the ground instead of letting Baros go past them and have a go at goal. Some of these free kicks has produced real goal scoring opportunities and goals.
What can't statistics say? Statistics can't show how much effort a player put into the game. Here Baros ranks among the very best. He is always 100%. And this is something I personally appreciate a lot. I can't stand to see players not putting in work, or players not being able to do so because of their poor level of fitness.
Runs. Baros makes more runs than any other player (except Riise maybe). This is important. The defenders do not like a striker like that. They must run more too, and their legs will tire. This also makes more space for other players and open up the defence. If the striker moves around a lot, we would definately see more goals from midfield.
Teamwork. I don't think Baros is as selfish as some people claim. If he was selfish, he would most definately not make all those runs. He would try to stay as close as possible to the box, and let the other players do the hard work. This would probably guarantee him more goals, as his legs would be more fresh, and he would be in more dangerous positions in front of the goal in larger parts of the game.
Contribution. Baros was one of the best players in our european campaign. When we played top teams like Juventus and Chelsea Baros's wild dog attitude chasing the ball like he was insane made it difficult for the opposition to involve their defenders in the attack and build up. Baros just did not allow that to happen. And he had come really valuable assist didn't he? Setting up Garcia's goal against Chelsea, and slotting the ball to Gerrard earning us a penalty? You can't take that away from him.
To sum up. I am surprised by the one-sidedness of the debate. Baros has a lot to offer, he is not all bad as some claim. He is a top striker.
For me, I am not so sure if it is a good or a bad thing if he leaves. I am not saying he is irreplacable, few are. It is all a matter of how much money a sale will bring in and who Baros is replaced with. If Baros leaves then Liverpool must replace him with a PROVEN goalscorer with EXPERIENCE. Cisse is still much of a question mark, and Morientes did not set the world alight last year did he?
If football is banned in heaven. I'd rather go to hell.