by JBG » Thu May 20, 2004 1:19 pm
I think the club MUST REJECT ANY BID from Chelsea for Steven Gerrard, whether its £30million, £40million or even a £100million purely on a point of principle.
If we give into Chelsea over Gerrard we are finished as a big club as Arsenal, Man UTD and Chelsea will know in future that they could steal away our best players merely by offering us loads of money.
Even if we did accept Chelsea's £30million bid, what would we do with it? There are very few of Steven Gerrard's ability in world football, and aside from Patrick Vieria there's no-one I can think of that is as good as Stevie.
We'd blow the £30million on rubbish and will have to wait another five years or so for another top class player to come through our academy to make up for the loss. And then Chelsea will write us yet another fat cheque for that new academy player and we'd be right back to square one.
The very fact that Chelsea have made a bid for our best player in my view demaands the resignation of David Moores.
We were perfectly poised at the start of the 1990s to dominate the Premiership and establish ourselves as the most powerful and wealthiest club in the world. Had our success continued we would have made buckets of cash from the Premiership, Champions League and ourseas markets in the 1990s. However, the board made some terrible blunders (Souness, Evans etc) and instead of us milking in all the tv and merchandising money, Man UTD beat us to it instead.
I remember seeing a report lately which estimated that at least half of Man UTD fans today started supporting the club in the 1990s as Man UTD were doing well in England and satellite tv broadcast their image across the world.
If it had been Liverpool (or Arsenal for that matter) who knows how things might have turned out.
I'm sick of David Moores regime of incompetency and if he sells Gerrard to Chelsea then we are finished: it'll mean that we are Chelsea, Man UTD and Arsenal's bitch.
Jolly Bob Grumbine.