I agree. How do you expect a player who for the most of his career at a club has been injured and has been benched to develop their talent? You can't, it makes no sense. He still needs more games to play, he hasn't had a full-season start yet while Fowler and Owen both had season starts to develop their talent.
stu_the_red wrote:Baros is a good player and will improve. For me though he'll never be any better than a first choice striker at a top 7 or 6 club. He's a similar level of ability as Murphy, maybe SLIGHTLY better. I don't think he'll improve much more.
jim_morrison_supported_liverpool wrote:no thats not the reason why stu and you know it.
he was always left out for heskey.
enough said.
the great one wrote:heskey is better than baros
A.B. wrote:whatever Owen wanted he got. He wanted Heskey rather than Baros because Heskey could never be better than him, while if Baros constantly had a good game every time he started he would had the pontential of being an equal to him or even better, in my opinion
the great one wrote:heskey is not on goals but effort and commintmentand rosicky is better than mista mista is an average player no better than muzzy izzet
the great one wrote:so wat has he achevied here nothink and his bein here for 5 years? i know his behind the pecking order with owen,folwer,collymore,hesky and anlkea but if he's good enough he will get a chance and i cnt suck eggs im a vegertaian
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests