Liverpool FC Forum

[Greavesie]

hey Rajiv, sorry to hear your struggles, what exactly is it you are struggling with? I studied this last year and at A level so I'm pretty clued up if I dare say so myself

What's the structure of the module? when I did it it included Judicial Precedent, Interpretation, Del Legislation and other things, is yours like that?

Will you be my breif Greavsie

[SupitsJonF]

Just some encouragement, if my uncle can become a rich lawyer in NY, I think it's really possible for anyone to become a lawyer .

[Judge]

hey mate   rive never heard of those words before im sure i'll get the hang of things though in time. just a matter of time before i find my momentum.

he'll struggle as maypax doesnt know what ''owt'' means!!

[Number 9]

hey mate   rive never heard of those words before im sure i'll get the hang of things though in time. just a matter of time before i find my momentum.

he'll struggle as maypax doesnt know what ''owt'' means!!

He's "Owt" upstairs!

[andy_g]

it good to know if i get in trouble i can come on here to find some one to get me off

or just look at the fit birds zone and get yourself off, mate

[Judge]

hey mate   rive never heard of those words before im sure i'll get the hang of things though in time. just a matter of time before i find my momentum.

he'll struggle as maypax doesnt know what ''owt'' means!!

He's "Owt" upstairs!

that would be NOWT upstairs 

[maypaxvobiscum]

to what extent do you agree with the following statement?

''once words have fixed behaviour, attitudes, laws as normal it is not easy to question these areas''

wtf?   

[Madmax]

it good to know if i get in trouble i can come on here to find some one to get me off

or just look at the fit birds zone and get yourself off, mate

[maypaxvobiscum]

[Judge]

to what extent do you agree with the following statement?

''once words have fixed behaviour, attitudes, laws as normal it is not easy to question these areas''

wtf?   

you cannot question was is fixed maypax. set in concrete, not open to interpretation etc

[maypaxvobiscum]

to what extent do you agree with the following statement?

''once words have fixed behaviour, attitudes, laws as normal it is not easy to question these areas''

wtf?   

you cannot question was is fixed maypax. set in concrete, not open to interpretation etc

thanks Judge, i kind of get the statement now.... but could it be open to manipulation?

[Judge]

the words could be manipulated, but in its original form the meaning remains constant. thats the crux of the issue

manipulate the words = change the meaning. it would not be law though

[maypaxvobiscum]

cheers Judge

[112-1077774096]

It says it is not easy to question them, that does not mean that you can not question them. the problem is when precedents have been set the court will normally follow them. you have laws and through the year judges have convicted or not convicted based on certain points, these then set precedents which the law generally follows, however a good enough argument could then set a new precedent if a judge was to find in your favour.

As an example a Barrister may argue that a chain of causation was broken at a certain point, if the judge agrees generally other judges will follow this allowing a Barrister in court to use it in future cases where he has the same situation, he will state the case and the judgement where the decision was made and the following judge normally follows it.

[maypaxvobiscum]

im gonna copy Peewee's answer