Liverpool FC Forum

by **Madmax** » Thu Jul 02, 2009 5:29 pm

bavlondon wrote:The no1 womens spot means nothing now. Safina was the no1 and she was the underdog what does that say? No wonder it has changed so many times in recent years. Henin never should have retired so early. At least Clijsters is coming back.

Whats happened to sharapova??

Yeah agree on henin, would have been good if she had carried on longer.

by **Madmax** » Thu Jul 02, 2009 5:49 pm

Women singles

Scroll down and check out the past womens singles winners.. American women have been dominating wimbledon since 1927.. Steffi graff gave the others a little breather but still the americans dominate...

With the women it was UK in the past and then few patches of the french and german..

Its a little competitive with the men.. Many different winners who dominated for many years.. Could get a little boring but interesting to say the least..
borg,sampras and federer have been the main ones.. Not to forget becker and mcenroe..

by **Gerrard30391** » Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:01 pm

If anyone is interested in a prediction game for Tennis, there is one on 606.

Wimbledon PG

Obviously that one is nearly over but there will be one for next week. It is quite good and well ran.

by **tubby** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:47 am

Madmax wrote:
bavlondon wrote:The no1 womens spot means nothing now. Safina was the no1 and she was the underdog what does that say? No wonder it has changed so many times in recent years. Henin never should have retired so early. At least Clijsters is coming back.

Whats happened to sharapova??

Yeah agree on henin, would have been good if she had carried on longer.

She's had a few injuries and it has hit her hard. It will take her a while to get back into the top 10 but she has won Wimbledon before so we know she is capable.

by **Judge** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 10:47 am

apart from that i would do serena

by **ConnO'var** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:19 pm

Roger's through to the finals yet again..... what a player.

Would be perfect if he broke Pistol Pete's record of grand slams at wimbledon..... the place where it all began for him...... The greatest player I've seen. :bowdown

If Roddcik makes it through, theres no doubt in my mind that roger will demolish him in the final. Murray on the other hand, has a better chance...... but I still hope he wipes the floor with the mardy cnut.

by **Judge** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:13 pm

ConnO'var wrote:with the mardy cnut.

thought mardy fish was out

by **Roger Red Hat** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:15 pm

murrey is doing :censored:

at the moment. he's pants

by **Dundalk** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:16 pm

1st set to Roddick

by **Madmax** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:54 pm

1-1 murray hit back 6-4... 1-1 third set ..

latest score and radio if you aint watching the tele

link

by **dawson99** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:55 pm

come on Murray!!!

by **Judge** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 5:14 pm

3-1 to roddick. 3rd set

by **Alex G.** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 5:14 pm

Roger will win, no doubt. Nadal is the only one who has balls to beat Quentin Tarantino.

by **Number 9** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 5:16 pm

Murray is looking like Roddicks Biatch!!

by **Dundalk** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 5:17 pm

bavlondon wrote:Get in lad. Great performance. Roddick or Hewitt shoulnd't pose any problem.

Liverpool FC Forum

Tennis thread

Who is online