Liverpool FC Forum

by **dawson99** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 1:04 pm

Stu is cool, cant ban him, hes just too clever for the rest of us to understand.

oh, and i voted never: as hes already banned but hes got another 2nd chance as 'he posts real clever stuff'

but what was the latest yellow card for?
and why have we got graham poll as a mod here as im sure the yellow-red ratio is fecked up

by **Sabre** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 1:17 pm

but what was the latest yellow card for?

For dishing out abuse against you and keeping a spat for too long. I agree that warning made by a fellow mod.

and why have we got graham poll as a mod here as im sure the yellow-red ratio is fecked up

Ironically, I thought the same thing for a while (when I wasn't a mod), some abusers *seemed* to be above a yellow.

by **Stu.Murph** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 3:05 pm

Sabre wrote:
but what was the latest yellow card for?

For dishing out abuse against you and keeping a spat for too long. I agree that warning made by a fellow mod.

and why have we got graham poll as a mod here as im sure the yellow-red ratio is fecked up

Ironically, I thought the same thing for a while (when I wasn't a mod), some abusers *seemed* to be above a yellow.

And Dawson, Peewee and Woof Woof wouldn't be any of those by any chance. :no

by **dawson99** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 3:07 pm

stu, i would like to apologise and we should start afresh, i will even take a yellow card as i was quite rude as well. then we can move on and be as one... a liverpool fan base

by **Sabre** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 3:10 pm

Stu.Murph wrote:
Sabre wrote:
but what was the latest yellow card for?

For dishing out abuse against you and keeping a spat for too long. I agree that warning made by a fellow mod.

and why have we got graham poll as a mod here as im sure the yellow-red ratio is fecked up

Ironically, I thought the same thing for a while (when I wasn't a mod), some abusers *seemed* to be above a yellow.

And Dawson, Peewee and Woof Woof wouldn't be any of those by any chance.

How could they be?

I've seen Dawson offers you a kind fresh start. I think Stu it would be good to accept it. It's nice to banter about topics (Fowler, formations, etc) but when it scalates it doesn't provide good stuff to 90% of readers.

Imagine an occasional reader that comes here and opens a discussion thread about strikers and finds pages and pages of fights. He'd say "this forum is cráp". And he would be right.

by **grayghost** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 3:27 pm

Jesus he so recks my head he seems to disagree with every post even if it contradicts what he said in a earlyer posts thinks he knows every thing when he does't and some of his posts are way to personal.

by **Stu.Murph** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 3:44 pm

grayghost wrote:Jesus he so recks my head he seems to disagree with every post even if it contradicts what he said in a earlyer posts thinks he knows every thing when he does't and some of his posts are way to personal.

by **joko** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 3:47 pm

Stu.Murph wrote:
grayghost wrote:Jesus he so recks my head he seems to disagree with every post

so do you agree or not?

by **LFC #1** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 3:47 pm

grayghost wrote:Jesus he so recks my head he seems to disagree with every post even if it contradicts what he said in a earlyer posts thinks he knows every thing when he does't and some of his posts are way to personal.

Do you seriously expect someone to read that lad? Don't you find it embarassing that your English is poorer than some people on here who have English as their second langauge?

Sort it out.

by **Stu.Murph** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 3:50 pm

LFC #1 wrote:
grayghost wrote:Jesus he so recks my head he seems to disagree with every post even if it contradicts what he said in a earlyer posts thinks he knows every thing when he does't and some of his posts are way to personal.

Do you seriously expect someone to read that lad? Don't you find it embarassing that your English is poorer than some people on here who have English as their second langauge?

Sort it out.

by **LFC #1** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 3:52 pm

Your gentlemanly conduct is rubbing off on me Stu.

by **grayghost** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 3:55 pm

LFC #1 wrote:Your gentlemanly conduct is rubbing off on me Stu.

I think stu has a new bird :hearts

talk about kissing :censored:

by **LFC #1** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 3:58 pm

There is a sarcastic joke in there which you have obviously failed to pick up due to either your lack of English skills or limited brain capacity. You decide which. :laugh:

by **grayghost** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 3:59 pm

LFC #1 wrote:
grayghost wrote:Jesus he so recks my head he seems to disagree with every post even if it contradicts what he said in a earlyer posts thinks he knows every thing when he does't and some of his posts are way to personal.

Do you seriously expect someone to read that lad? Don't you find it embarassing that your English is poorer than some people on here who have English as their second langauge?

Sort it out.

This is a liverpool forum not a spelling exam. you kiss @ss

by **LFC #1** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 4:03 pm

grayghost wrote:
LFC #1 wrote:
grayghost wrote:Jesus he so recks my head he seems to disagree with every post even if it contradicts what he said in a earlyer posts thinks he knows every thing when he does't and some of his posts are way to personal.

Do you seriously expect someone to read that lad? Don't you find it embarassing that your English is poorer than some people on here who have English as their second langauge?

Sort it out.

This is a liverpool forum not a spelling exam. you kiss @ss

It would help if you could be coherent though. People might actually read your posts.

Consider it friendly advice.

Liverpool FC Forum

Stu - How long ?

Stu - How long ?

Who is online