dawson99 wrote:LFC2007 wrote:dawson99 wrote:shanks72 wrote:dawson99 wrote:6: cant hunt foxes, even tho they are a menace
Foxes also have a right to life and if they 'cause a nusance (which I dispute) it's usually down to man again.
Anyways, regarding your smoking.
If it didn't affect other people there would be no problem.
If cigarettes could be invented that didn't kill then it wouldn't matter where you smoked.
It is not about you personally....it's about protecting innocent people from breathing in potentially harmful chemicals.
Why can't you smokers see that!!!!
If you were non smokers I reckon you'd be welcoming in this ban with open arms. It is all about protecting people...
After all why should you have the right to inflict your poisonous fumes onto us!!!
yet for hundreds of years we have been allowed. now this nanny state again being absolutely pathetic changes things on a whim.
All im saying is give us a smoking pub, why not?
have a non smoking pub and a smoking pub, see what one the people want!
does that not seem right to anyone?
Private members clubs, yes. Public bars/restaurants, no.
For hundreds of years it's been accepted because people were not aware of the health effects of smoking!
It's only recently that extensive research has shown the effects of passive smoking aswell.
u facist commie!!!
u r SERIOUSLY saying that the people should not have the god given right to decide whether to go into a smoking or non smoking pub? Seriously?
Come on. Take 2 pubs. one is non smoking only. one is smoking. if the people want they can go to either.
that is the fair democratic way.
I cant see how you would not like something that 'the people' get to decide on?
you might hate smokers mate but from what uve said there u r on the wacky baccy
Fascist my ar.se look it up.
You put it in a way that appears correct in theory, but not in practice.
There are not many pubs I know that have a non-smoking pub right next to them, people have to change their life or move to another area - travel for longer just to get to a non-smoking pub - because in REALITY the model of having a non-smoking pub near to a smoking pub in every village in England does not exist.
In a rural area with few pubs, does the person have to move over 50 miles just to get to a non-smoking pub?
Where is their right?
They are an individual, where do their liberties go?
I'm not on wacky baccy, you are in a midset of unreality, that does not put it into any context.