Fowler_E7 wrote:Judge wrote:Fowler_E7 wrote:Big Niall wrote:Judge wrote:Fowler they come under the terrorism act
criteria is different for those people. i understand what you say and probably some are innocent, but others have been caught with or had dealings with known terror cells. In other words they were actually seen to be doing wrong, and most probably been video'd or had their phone tapped and recorded.
So, tbh, they deserve everything they got.
i think you feel different if they got free and then they decided to go on the rampage, and as a result your family was killed by some numpty who, as barry puts it, strap a rucksack to there backs and blow folk up
think hard fowler. next time it could be you
I agree - to a point. I don't think guilt can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. I think they should be tried and have three possible verdicts
guilty - death penalty
Unsure - keep them locked up but in relevant comfort as some of them will be innocent and some guilty
Innocent - let them free.
what can they be tried for? they been charged with nothing even though they have been imprisoned for years now. If they had a shred of evidence of anything im sure they put someone on trial.
ring obama up and tell him that those folk at guatanamo can stay at your house free of charge
you got his number? most people who come my round house are innocent members of society who havnt been charged as criminals aswell
what i said