Good publicity for the area. - The dark side of anfield

Please use this forum for general Non-Football related chat

Postby Leonmc0708 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:14 pm

Sensationalist and deliberately misleading.

The row of houses next to the Albert only came don at the beginning of 2007. This guy makes out thats what it looks like in 2006, its not possible as his pictures clearly sho the row of houses not there.
Last edited by Leonmc0708 on Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
JUSTICE FOR THE 96

Image
User avatar
Leonmc0708
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 8420
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 11:44 am
Location: SEFTON SHED

Postby J*o*n*D*o*e » Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:28 pm

would not surprise me if he was paid for writing that load of cr@p, amazes me how people get away with writing this garbage because people will read it, believe it and use it to beat us down with again and again despite the fact countless people have replied to it to put him right.
Image
ImageImage
User avatar
J*o*n*D*o*e
 
Posts: 2355
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 9:20 pm
Location: Liverpool

Postby JC_81 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:30 pm

Emerald Red wrote:
SouthCoastShankly wrote:Yeah the article is written as if Anfield is the only place to host a big football club but be in the middle of a an area that can only be described as a dive.

You should see Landsdown Road. Even the area around Celtic Park is a dive, so I'm told.

The area around Celtic Park is probably the roughest and most run down area I have ever seen.
JC_81
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 5296
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2003 9:57 pm

Previous

Return to General Chat Forum

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 48 guests

  • Advertisement
cron
ShopTill-e