red37 wrote:fIts like 'mental tennis' this. Great for the creative juices!
In truth, there isn't exactly any real value in claim versus counter-claim at all really when it boils down to it. Particularly within the boundaries of subjects similar to this..On that note alone, along with the unfortunate fact that my 3 kids are still up and vying for my sparse attention away from the delicious fruits of any meaningful
jibberish discussion on here. The pleasure will have to be declared as all mine...
However, not being the kind of Dog to let a bone pass by, unsavaged. I will address your swift, yet unsurprisingly curt response albeit briefly. And not at all with any note of veiled arrogance either. Promise.
Point 1. Stagnant argument then. Either way up, neither stance is valid. Until irrefutably proven otherwise.
2a. Block - Mental state of being, (contextually held) that through some triggered instance shuts down certain cognisant areas of the Brain (Conscience) maybe more apt. That otherwise allows free egress of any rationale capable of handling the situation at hand. Much akin to the requisite will-power necessary for the damnation of nicotine, amongst other 'evils' for want of a suitable analogy. I could go on about neuro-transmitters and their lack/profusion of yadda yadda... Basically, in this example 'Fear' of the unknown is likely to induce such a 'block' to the subscriber/believer call it what you will.
Hang on a mo...
2b.
I have no fear of exploring the possibility of the paranormal
But you find consummate ease with which to dismiss the word of others (who have experienced it) at the same time? Strange, i was under the illusion that you were quite flexible.
3. Good lad. Right answer.
4. In all probability, an accurate statement to offer. However, the intrusion of my own thoughts on the subject are not infact grounded in any Religion. (the consequences of which iam more than willing to entertain) Just, not for the purposes of my own agenda.
5. Clarification of your own beliefs might help proceedings descend into further - jibberish. Of course, thy will be done.
5b.
I base my views on empirical evidence or at the very least strong and consistent anecdotal evidence.
Do i detect an inconsistency in your standpoint, a chink in the armour....
Jibberish alert:
anecdotal
Tell me you didn't Google this article: Please!
Anecdotal approach (RE: Paranormal - Wiki)
"An anecdotal approach to the paranormal involves the collection of anecdotal evidence, which is an informal account of something that presumably happened. Anecdotes are often in contrast to empirical evidence, which are types of formal accounts that can be investigated using the scientific method".
when you could have casually 'plumped' for one of the other 4 options...unless of course the cracks are assuming abyss like proportions!
Anyway, gotta go, the kids are murdering the missus' state of well being...and im on a promise
