
Woollyback wrote:as for everybody's collective guilt for dragging a respectful thread into a spiral of abuse and name-calling, it's disgraceful and i don't care who started it
Woollyback wrote:LA's rants about the establishment and conspiracy theories can be a bit tiresome sometimes but i find them a whole lot more palatable than some of the sh!te on here about "britain for the british" and "kick out the immigrants"
woof woof ! wrote:andy_g wrote:the people that accuse karim of always starting arguments are way off the mark in my book
And yet Andy so many threads that KARIMINAL@AOL (as he likes to tag himself), so many threads he participates in end up in a brawl . Why is that ?
Certainly everyone is entitled to their own opinion ,perhaps the problem lies with the way in which that opininion is expressed .In your misunderstood mates case it is usually with a certainty that borders on arrogance seasoned with scorn for anyone's opinion that doesn't coincide with his .Concluding vast numbers of his observations with the phrase "End of", to me signals an individual who isn't really interested in another persons point of view . You either agree with him or end up being called any number of derogatory names ranging from sheep (one of your favourites I see ) to C'unt and then inevitably the bun fight begins.Recently I noticed a member addressing him by his first name and receiving a s'hitload of abuse in return for daring to address him with such familiarity.The only balanced thing about your friends personality is that he has a massive chip on BOTH shoulders.This forum would be far better off without him . I may be one of the "sheep" that you refer to ,with no opinion of my own but if something looks like sh'it ,smells like sh'it and tastes like sh'it chances are it is sh'it .
Surely 5000 "sheep" can't all be wrong ?
andy_g wrote:woof woof ! wrote:andy_g wrote:the people that accuse karim of always starting arguments are way off the mark in my book
And yet Andy so many threads that KARIMINAL@AOL (as he likes to tag himself), so many threads he participates in end up in a brawl . Why is that ?
Certainly everyone is entitled to their own opinion ,perhaps the problem lies with the way in which that opininion is expressed .In your misunderstood mates case it is usually with a certainty that borders on arrogance seasoned with scorn for anyone's opinion that doesn't coincide with his .Concluding vast numbers of his observations with the phrase "End of", to me signals an individual who isn't really interested in another persons point of view . You either agree with him or end up being called any number of derogatory names ranging from sheep (one of your favourites I see ) to C'unt and then inevitably the bun fight begins.Recently I noticed a member addressing him by his first name and receiving a s'hitload of abuse in return for daring to address him with such familiarity.The only balanced thing about your friends personality is that he has a massive chip on BOTH shoulders.This forum would be far better off without him . I may be one of the "sheep" that you refer to ,with no opinion of my own but if something looks like sh'it ,smells like sh'it and tastes like sh'it chances are it is sh'it .
Surely 5000 "sheep" can't all be wrong ?
oops - i never noticed the sheep connection. when i talk about sheep i mean people who obviously have no viewpoint of their own but are happy to agree with the majority. its not a case of being 'with us or against us' woof, as you seem to suggest by now referring to me as LA's friend. i personally don't find anything offensive in his posts and in my view the arguments are often started by some people's reactions to what he says. anyway, i'm not really interested in getting involved in a drawn out debate/bunfight/bitchfest with anyone - despite the fact that some of them are kuntz
Judge wrote:andy_g wrote:woof woof ! wrote:andy_g wrote:the people that accuse karim of always starting arguments are way off the mark in my book
And yet Andy so many threads that KARIMINAL@AOL (as he likes to tag himself), so many threads he participates in end up in a brawl . Why is that ?
Certainly everyone is entitled to their own opinion ,perhaps the problem lies with the way in which that opininion is expressed .In your misunderstood mates case it is usually with a certainty that borders on arrogance seasoned with scorn for anyone's opinion that doesn't coincide with his .Concluding vast numbers of his observations with the phrase "End of", to me signals an individual who isn't really interested in another persons point of view . You either agree with him or end up being called any number of derogatory names ranging from sheep (one of your favourites I see ) to C'unt and then inevitably the bun fight begins.Recently I noticed a member addressing him by his first name and receiving a s'hitload of abuse in return for daring to address him with such familiarity.The only balanced thing about your friends personality is that he has a massive chip on BOTH shoulders.This forum would be far better off without him . I may be one of the "sheep" that you refer to ,with no opinion of my own but if something looks like sh'it ,smells like sh'it and tastes like sh'it chances are it is sh'it .
Surely 5000 "sheep" can't all be wrong ?
oops - i never noticed the sheep connection. when i talk about sheep i mean people who obviously have no viewpoint of their own but are happy to agree with the majority. its not a case of being 'with us or against us' woof, as you seem to suggest by now referring to me as LA's friend. i personally don't find anything offensive in his posts and in my view the arguments are often started by some people's reactions to what he says. anyway, i'm not really interested in getting involved in a drawn out debate/bunfight/bitchfest with anyone - despite the fact that some of them are kuntz
kuntz - wasnt he a german international with a first name of stefan
JBG wrote:
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 27 guests